“highly significant”

All analyses were highly significant (p<0.001).

Although it represented only <0.1% of the total proportion of CD4 + T cells, this rare circulating subset producing all four cytokines (IFNγ + , IL-17A + , GM-CSF + , IL-2 + ) showed a modest reduction as early as 12 weeks and a highly significant ( P < 0.001) reduction at weeks 28 and 52 after the start of therapy (Fig. 3d,h ).

Rph3A+ spines exhibit a highly significant increased spine head area (***p < 0.001; Figures 1 C and 1D and Table 1 ) and PSD length (***p < 0.001; Figures 1 E and 1F and Table 1 ) and also an augmented PSD thickness (*p < 0.05; Figures 1 G and 1H and Table 1 ) compared to Rph3A− ones, thus defining a selective accumulation of the protein in more “mature” synapses.

Comparison of cfDNA between MASLD and healthy controls revealed a highly significant difference in hepatocyte proportions (p < 0.001), while no statistically significant differences were observed for the other cell types.

The difference between the mean correlations for the two categories was also highly significant (t(14) = −5.40, p < 0.001).

Similarly, reflex assessment documentation increased from 62% (31 out of 50 cases) to 96% (48 out of 50 cases), a highly significant improvement (Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.001).

Post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test demonstrated highly significant participation of IS and CS in the increased expression of iNOS protein (*** p < 0.001 vs IS, ### p < 0.01 vs. 7D CS) (Fig. 9e ).

All conditions (0-back, 1-back, 2-back, 3-back) show highly significant effects (p <0.001) compared to the reference level, “rest”.

Highly significant ( P < 0.001) differences were observed in the values of BFP and LBM in normal and obese participants across ABO blood types.

The correlation was deemed significant if p < 0.05 and highly significant if p < 0.001.

Pain, aseptic loosening, operational flaws, and broken patellar component were all found to be highly significant (p < 0.001).

* indicates a significant difference ( p < 0.05), ** indicates a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01), and *** indicates an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.001).

The LT 50 regression models for both oyster subspecies were highly significant (LGR, P < 0.001, r 2 = 0.896 for C. gigas gigas and P < 0.001, r 2 = 0.885 for C. gigas angulata ) ( Supplementary Table 2 ).

The ROC curves for all biomarker levels were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for all, Fig. 4 ).

Results On analysis of 180 participants, the Brahmi group showed highly significant results in the total memory score, 9 out of 10 subsets of PGI-CMS, and IQ with p < 0.001.

All correlations with LLS were found highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Linear correlation is highly significant ( P < 0.001) and is described by the following equations (where IQ = image quality): \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin

Measures of admissions per RN and the proportion of higher acuity patients were also highly significant (p<0.001).

Indeed, the interaction between spermatogenesis temperature (sperm production) and offspring production temperature was highly significant ( β = 7.5, F 1,104 = 29.6, p<0.001), while the main effect of male treatment was not significant ( β = 0.7, F 1,104 = 1.1, p=0.290).

This showed a highly significant difference [χ 2 (3)=74.67, p <0.001] between the performance across the four lists (2 mono-syllabic and 2 bi-syllabic list at 0 and +10 dB SNR) each participant heard.

All comparisons demonstrated highly significant concordance ( p < 0.001).

This interaction was highly significant (Pillai test, p < 0.001), and remained so after adjusting for gender, age and BMI (Pillai test, p < 0.001).

A repeated measures, one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in OGI across the brain ( F 6,72 = 74.16, p < 0.001).

The linear regression revealed a highly significant temporal effect of time ( p < 0.001; Figure 3 ) on glucose release, replicating the effects expected during digestion in the GI tract.

The mean time to reversal of hypotensive state was maximum in Group D (87.2 ± 28.87) and statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) in comparison with Group N (15.2 ± 6.12) and Group E (20.0 ± 10.08).