Among all variables, both maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperatures showed a strong positive correlation with strong positive correlation with stripe rust severity, with correlation coefficients of 0.66 and 0.70, respectively, and were highly significant (p<0.001) ( Figure 2 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Overall, the canonical axes were highly significant for both vertebrates (Monte Carlo permutation test: F (8,21) = 1.50, p < 0.001) and spermatophytes (Monte Carlo permutation test: F (8,21) = 2.04, p < 0.001).
This analysis still results in a highly significant difference in maximum frequency (LME: F (1,38.407) = 238.47, P < 0.001), clearly indicating that the observed increase in maximum frequency occurs only when females are with their calves, and not with other conspecifics.
It was highly significant, above (p < 0.001) than in the studied population.
Mean comparisons were performed by Tukey test, considering p ≤ 0.05 (*) significant, p ≤ 0.01 (**) highly significant, p ≤ 0.001 (***) very highly significant, and ‘NS’ not significant.
In Mélapleu, schools were cited as the most important source of information (62%), with a statistically highly significant difference to Zouatta II (18%; χ 2 = 13.4, P <0.001).
For the PUT, a highly significant and robust GLM model emerged (adjusted R 2 = 0.623, F(12,167) = 25.62, p < 0.001), explaining over 60 % of the variance in susceptibility.
All correlations were positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The inference of a selective sweep at pink lysin was highly significant (P<0.001) as no simulated dataset had an LR1 value more extreme than that of the observed data.
Statistically significant changes were classified as significant ( ∗ ) where p < 0.05, more significant ( ∗∗ ) where p < 0.01, and highly significant ( ∗∗∗ ) where p < 0.001.
A highly significant effect of age was seen, with animals displaying a decreased latency to fall from the rotarod as they aged ( Fig. 6 : Age; F 5,260 = 15.98, p < 0.001).
Fatigue levels also had a highly significant measurement difference (see Figure 6 ) (F(1, 23) = 13.979; p < 0.001; η p 2 = 0.38).
Sperm morphology The percentage of normal sperm morphology in animals treated with DXM alone also showed a highly significant difference (p<0.001) when compared to the control group.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves show that nuclear p65 expression tended to be associated with an increased risk of BCR in the Test-TMA cohort ( p = 0.06) ( Fig 2A ), and this association was highly significant in the Validation-TMA cohort ( p < 0.001) ( Fig 2B ).
Molecular Interactions Ingenuity based pathway analysis revealed highly significant overlap with 92 canonical pathways with p<0.001 and a total of 196 canonical pathways p<0.05.
This is a highly significant difference ( t test: t 18 = 7.14, P < 0.001).
The two-way ANOVA indicated highly significant ( p < 0.001) effects of both salinity and the salinity × hormones interaction on shoot and root FW and DW.
Age, BMI, the time between trauma and surgery, causes of injury, occupation, and the presence of an ACL injury all showed highly significant associations (p < 0.001) with postoperative outcomes.
However, crude protein content had a highly significant ( p < 0.001) and strong negative correlation with dry biomass production (-88%).
A one-way analysis of variance reveals the effect of the amplitude of the target step on the time to the peak response to be highly significant (monkey F: F df = 9 = 1915.51, p-value<0.001; monkey M: F df = 9 = 186.81, p-value<0.001; monkey J: F df = 9 = 13.69, p-value<0.001).
The interaction between the diagnosis of HTN and the benefit of trandolapril treatment was highly significant (p < 0.001) ( Gustafsson et al 1997 ).
Two-way ANOVA (Solvent × Time) revealed a highly significant main effect of solvent (F(1,20) = 1526.28, p < 0.001; partial η 2 = 0.987), indicating that solvent selection accounts for nearly all explainable variance in TPC within vortex-assisted systems.
These differences were highly significant for both Dnmt1- and Dnmt3a , 3b -deficient cells ( Fig. 4 , P < 0.001 for every comparison).
The differencies between the three group by the one-way ANOVA was highly significant: ** = p < 0.001 or significant:* = p < 0.05.
Light and fungus/carbon treatments had highly significant interaction effects germination of E . phoenicea germination (ANOVA: df = 2, 59; F = 113.63; P < .001) ( Table 2 ).