The effect of glycerol supplementation was highly significant (p < .001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
One-way ANOVAs found highly significant differences in bacterial abundance among cities ( Table 1: F 2,495 = 31.71; P<0.001), between the offices inhabited by men and women ( F 1,495 = 10.295; P = 0.001) and among office surfaces ( F 4,495 = 10.661; P<0.001).
The two-fold higher resistance to phosmet of females compared with males was highly significant (relative female:male potency = 1.99, t-value = 11.3, p-value < 0.001).
Moreover, the chi-square test results showed a highly significant association between the intervention and changes in risk levels (χ2 = 28.214, df = 2, p < 0.001), supporting the effectiveness of the intervention as given in Table 6 .
Consistent with the down-regulated expression, we found an increase in SRRM4 promoter methylation that was highly significant in tumors from all tissues, even in liver ( p < 0.001; Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test; Fig 2B , S2 Data ).
(2012) , who showed that highly significant risk factors ( P < 0.001) related to the conditions of birds on farm, namely lower BW, will increase the risk of mortality on transport.
rattus a similar 2-way interaction was highly significant (seasonal cycle*season, F 2, 336 = 7.57, P = 0.001) and the pattern of change was much the same in seasonal cycles 1 and 2, but not in cycle 3, when mean helminth species richness was higher in the dry season compared to the wet season much as in cycle 1 (Figure 2A ).
extremely significantqualified
p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant (*), p < 0.01 as highly significant (**) and p < 0.001 as extremely significant (***). 3.
Table 1 summarizes mean serum laboratory investigations at baseline and after 12 months. Regarding urinary cytokines, there was a highly significant decrease of mean MIF/creatinine ratio, MCP-1/creatinine ratio, CCL-18/creatinine ratio, and CCL-15/creatinine ratio after twelve months of follow-up ( P value <0.001).
A highly significant difference ( P <0.001) was observed between the Gold alloy and the two other groups.
However, there was a highly significant up-regulation in PD-L1 expression level in the liver tissues of HCC patients ( p < 0.001, Fig. 2 A ).
The median rate fell from 64.7 spikes/s (control) to 35.4 spikes/s (salicylate); a highly significant change (Kruskal-Wallis test p < 0.001).
A one-way ANOVA on these ratings disclosed a highly significant effect of emotion [ F (2, 34) = 39.94, p <.001, η p 2 = .701].
The GHS-R1A antagonist (1 and 3 mg/kg JMV2959) that was administered together with THC during conditioning dose-dependently reduced the development of (biased) CPP; but only the higher dose induced a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001).
Glucose concentration was not correlated with glucan depolymerization and glucose consumption rates at harvest one, but after three and six months we found highly significant positive relationships of glucose concentration with glucan depolymerization ( r = 0.73, p < 0.001) and glucose consumption ( r = 0.90, p < 0.001) ( Fig. 6 ).
A two-way ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of stimulus type in V1 ( F = 62.2; p << 0.001; df = 1) and FFA ( F = 10.2; p < 0.005; df = 1) with greater responses to visual stimuli.
Random intercept variances for participants and scenarios were both highly significant, with LR χ 2 (1) = 2848.503, p < .001, and LR χ 2 (1) = 1939.140, p < .001, respectively.
The test yielded a highly significant ( P < 0.001) but relatively weak positive correlation between geographic distance and community composition ( r = 0.236, 0.224, and 0.239 for the Archaea, Bacteria, and Universal datasets, respectively; Fig. 4 H ).
Differences in Physical Activity Levels The one-way ANOVA revealed that there were highly significant differences in the levels of PA (as measured by total METs-min) of youth across the three cities (F 2,2244 = 258.02, p < 0.001).
Of the ten studied loci, highly significant deviations from the genetic equilibrium were established for the SO005 locus, according to Hardy–Weinberg ( p < 0.001).
The difference between emmetropic and myopic eyes was highly significant (−8.8 ± 9.2 μm vs. +9.1 ± 11.2 μm, respectively, P = 0.001).
There was a highly significant increase in the values of CK-MB level (P < 0.001) and troponin I level (P < 0.001) in the no-reflow group, compared to normal flow group.
The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) index of sampling adequacy was .93 ( very good ) in the whole sample, and the Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (69565.9, degrees of freedom = 1,770, p < .001).
Combining ability and gene action Parents and hybrids were observed to have highly significant (p < 0.001) GCA and SCA effects, in direct as well as reciprocal crosses, for TSW and OC ( Table 2 ).
The genotypic variation was highly significant (P<0.001) at two severe stressed (Beg-WL and Hyd-DT) and two moderate stress sites (Hyd-WL and Nht-DT).