“highly significant”

Detection rates of hypertensive retinopathy Based on fundus examinations, the overall detection rates of hypertensive retinopathy were 3.5% (dipper), 46.8% (non-dipper), and 50.0% (reverse-dipper), with a highly significant difference among groups (χ 2 =35.066, P < 0.001).

When the relationship between biofilm formation and azole resistance was investigated, the results demonstrated highly significant relations with all tested azole drugs (P < 0.001 for each) ( Table 1 ).

A likelihood-ratio test against a null model was highly significant χ 4 2 = 174.75 , p < 0.001 , and the pseudo-R 2 was 12.0%.

The antioxidant capacity of the non-PC fraction exceeded that of PC and ACE; this difference was highly significant across a wide dose range ( p <.001).

Evaluation of antioxidant activity of trans-crocetin in vitro The scavenging ability of trans-crocetin for superoxide anion (•O 2 − ) was evaluated by the lumino-DMSO-NaOH luminescence system, and as shown in Table 5 , trans-crocetin had more vital scavenging abilities than the positive control ascorbic acid, with highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) compared with the control group.

The difference was considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05, very significant when p ≤ 0.01, and highly significant when p ≤ 0.001.

However, comparing narrow (spectrum value of 1) and broad (spectrum value of 3), we find, as predicted, a highly significant association between broad-spectrum toxins and density-dependent regulation ( β : 4.1699; S.E.: 1.2196; P < 0.001).

Depression was more common in women age 26 years and above and highly significant in those women age 35 years and above (P < 0.001).

4 B show a massive and highly significant variation of more than 90% of the descriptors (55/61) related to the mitochondrial phenotype, most of them [47] with p < 0.001 * ** (Mann Whitney Test with Benjamini Hochberg correction).

Sentences (4) Mi sa che p [To me it knows that p], uncertainty EMP (b) As for sentence (4), the analysis revealed highly significant statistical differences χ 2 (2, N = 201) = 230.668, p < .001 concerning the EMPs selected by the participants.

The drop in mean insecticide concentration between three to six months and 14-20 months was highly significant (p < 0.001 by Bonferroni test), but there was little additional loss of insecticide between 14-20 and 26-32 months (p = 0.294).

were highly significant ( p < 0.001) in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group of patients ( Figure 4H ).

Furthermore, highly significant positive correlations were observed between the Cd content in pumpkin roots and stems ( p < 0.001), as well as between the Cd content in stems and leaves ( p < 0.001).

With respect to cluster * age, Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests revealed that there were highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences between two of the clusters (1 * 3 and 2 * 3).

In addition, only the PM components with a diameter less than 2.5 μm were able to determine a statistically significant reduction in cellular activity ( p < 0.01) in both B3 and C3 samples and a highly significant reduction in D3 ( p < 0.001).

Higher levels of lactate, PCT, NEWS, and LP-NEWS scores are associated with higher APACHE II and SOFA scores, all highly significant ( P < 0.001).

7 E) indicated a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) in the expression of the LRPPRC between the high- and low-risk groups of PD samples.

Spearman rank correlation between beetle tunnel volume and mass loss was highly significant (p < 0.001) with coefficient ρ = 0.49 (Fig. 4 ).

The difference between two groups was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Chi-square values reveal highly significant differences (p < 0.001) in all outcomes.

The differences were considered significant at P ≤0.05 and highly significant at P ≤ 0.001.

5B–D ) demonstrated the strongest and most stable group separations, with R 2 values around 0.452–0.453 and highly significant P = 0.001.

When accounting for the discrepancy in root lengths, WT barley bound 4.8-fold more soil per unit of root length than brb ( Figure 1C ); as indicated by a highly significant ( P < 0.001) genotype*root length interaction.

The log-rank test was highly significant (χ2 = 58.965, p < 0.001).

The relationship between air and water temperatures was highly significant (adjusted R 2 = 0.83, F (1, 26) = 133.3, P <0.001) (see figure S1 ).