“highly significant”

Interestingly, Matsuo and colleagues had found that Jax mice emitted 16–25% more DSI contacts than NIH mice, a difference that became highly significant ( P <0.001) if the group sizes exceeded 10.

In a study done by El Baz et al [ 16 ], the malignant cases showed a highly significant increase in the mean percentage of expression of Fas in tissue compared to the chronic cystitis ( P < 0.001) group.

Late MRI findings showed a highly significant decrease in antral frequency for both water (2.66 ± 0.40 vs 2.48 ± 0.39, p < 0.001) and juice (2.72 ± 0.38 vs 2.40 ± 0.37, p < 0.001), while there was a highly significant increase in antral velocity, sleeve transit time, and contraction height for both water and juice ( p < 0.001) (Table 3 ).

There was a marginally significant [CO 2 ]×cultivar interaction ( P <0.1) for the sterility percentage, but the cultivar×year and [CO 2 ]×cultivar×year interactions were highly significant ( P <0.001 and P <0.01, respectively).

3 a), whereas there was a highly significant effect of treatment in the sub-colony exposed to tourists (treatment, F 2,20 = 9.53, P = 0.001).

On the other hand, both dignity and prompt attention barriers are highly significant ( p <0.001) for TB mortality rate regressions.

A highly significant association was observed in non-diabetics (p=0.001) while no significant association was observed in diabetic subjects (p=0.567).

cure rates was highly significant in favor of tribendimidine ( p = 0.001).

All coefficients were highly significant ( p < 0.001 ).

By age groups, the prevalence in younger than or equal to 1 year (13.1 %, 95 % CI: 9.1–17.2; 35/266) was markedly higher than those in old than 1 year (0.9 %, 95 % CI: 0.2–1.6; 7/745), and the difference was highly significant (p < 0.001).

Development and Validation of a Prognostic PCD Signature in PDAC From the TCGA-PDAC cohort, we identified 97 highly significant DEPRGs ( p < 0.001).

Differences were regarded as statistically significant at P < 0.05, more significant at *P < 0.01, and highly significant at **P < 0.001.

There was a highly significant positive correlation between the density of T2R38-IR cells and BMI values (P = 0.001), but not between T2R38 mRNA levels and BMI ( Fig 2 ).

The analysis revealed highly significant genetic differentiation among populations ( F st = 0.77, p <0.001), which accounted for 76.68% of the entire genetic variation.

The age difference did not reach statistical significance for r within-maze (W = 219; p = .423; δ = 0.15) and for r within-frame (W = 154; p = .341; δ = 0.20), but it was highly significant for r between-frames (W = 101; p < .001; δ = − 0.60).

At 12 weeks, the 30% ORM-11984 implants and to a lesser extent the 50% ORM-11984 implants showed a delayed start of new bone formation around the implant, but the difference in the amount was still highly significant (p < 0.001 for both groups) compared to the placebo group.

In all cases, the proportion of distance accounted for by subject identity was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The log‐rank test indicated a highly significant difference between the two cohorts ( p < 0.001), with a chi‐square (χ 2 ) value of 56.737.

However, a small but highly significant reduction was observed in arc− neurons (8.0 ± 0.7 before KN93 to 7.4 ± 10.7 pA after KN93 [ n = 6], P = 0.001; n = 4 mice).

1.94 ± 0.35 g in MD, expressed as bending force needed to elicit 50% of positive responses), and exhibited a highly significant decrease after CCI on the ipsilateral (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.001) but not the contralateral side in both.

Of note, when Ctrl was matched to Riva, corrected Kaplan-Meier analyses during the total FU revealed highly significant differences for both endpoints: rates of hospitalization for new-onset of AF ( Figure 1 , p < 0.001) as well as rates of SCD ( Figure 2 , p < 0.001). 4 Discussion The COVID-19 pandemic led to a burgeoning population of patients recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection and is still affecting healthcare systems worldwide.

The result showed a highly significant interaction between eye and session ( F (1,14) = 18.33, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.567), which strongly supports an eye-specific deprivation effect in the LGN.

Differences were considered significant when P <0.05 (*), very significant when P <0.01 (**) and highly significant when P <0.001 (***).

However, inoculation remained highly significant ( p < 0.001), with increases of 40.8%, 77.3%, 108.6%, and 171.8% at 5–12.5 g, respectively.

The ANCOVAs showed highly significant between-group effects for almost all outcomes at both assessment points; all significance levels were P< .001 apart from work engagement at T3 ( P= .002) and the physical health component of quality of life at T3 ( P= .04).