“highly significant”

SOD activity reached the highest level at the maximal Hg concentration (265.71 ± 7.82 U g –1 min –1 ), and the difference in SOD activity among different Hg treatments was highly significant ( F = 28.755, P < 0.001).

In contrast, nicotine effectively prevented mitochondrial swelling in isolated mitochondria, showing a highly significant difference compared to the MPTP group ( P ≤0.001), as shown in Figure 9 .

4) We found highly significant differences for smoking-related VOCs such as acetonitrile, benzene and cyclohexadiene (p<0.001, respectively) between active smokers and non-smokers ( figure 1a ).

Importantly, a highly significant relationship was found between serum CO3-610 and portal hypertension ( r = 0.84; P < 0.001).

However, the difference between Finnhorses and mixed‐breed group was highly significant ( G = 32.773, p < .001), there were in general much more TT homozygotes (long‐distance runners) and less CC homozygotes (sprinters) in Finnhorses than in other breeds.

The difference between the two mode of applications was highly significant ( P < .001).

On the other hand, clinical parameters that were likely to be positively associated with inflammatory bone resorption in this group did result in higher PAI scores at a highly significant level ( P < 0.001): teeth with a pain history of more than one week and root filled teeth had higher PAI scores than teeth that had not been painful for this duration or were not root filled, respectively.

Our study showed that flooding has a highly significant effect ( P <0.001) on AMF diversity (based on phylotype richness, Shannon's index and phylotype composition), and the effects are dependent on the degree of flooding.

The difference in the response to CSF1 based on genotype was highly significant (p < 0.001).

The difference between pre-operative and post-operative BCVA was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The analysis of the clinical attachment level (CAL) results indicated that the Group factor was highly significant ( p < 0.001), whereas Time ( p = 0.555) and the Group vs.

The highly significant p-value <0.001 suggests there is a less than 0.1% probability that this strong positive relationship occurred by chance.

Results: We found a highly significant correlation between the HR measured with the Holter monitor and HR measured with 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (r = 0.77, p < 0.001).

For our primary outcomes measures, we found a highly significant difference in PCL-S scores between W1 and W7 for both the propranolol group [ t (28) = 5.683 p < 0.001] and the placebo group [ t (28) = 7.410 p < 0.001] (Fig. 2A ).

The result for the type difference is found to be highly significant by both the F test (p < 0.001) and the SEM test (p < 0.001), and finally the sex x type interaction is statistically nonsignificant for the F test (p = 0.186) and the SEM test (p = 0.184).

P<0.05 was considered significant, P<0.01 was considered highly significant, and P<0.001 was considered very highly significant.

The 'U'-shaped shape of the age curve for earache is confirmed using multiple regression by a highly significant quadratic effect of age after taking the linear effect into account (p < .001).

Data Analysis The effect of EO and time of packaging were evaluated through ANOVA one-way with the STATISTIC 2014 SW program (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA), in which the effect was considered not significant when p ≥ 0.05; significant when p < 0.05; very significant when p < 0.01; and highly significant when p < 0.001, and determined by Tukey’s HSD test (“Honestly Significantly Different”). 3.

The difference betGP-73 the groups was highly significant (U = 8.6, p < 0.001), indicating a strong discriminatory potential for GP-73 in identifying AIH cases (as shown in supplementary Table 1 ) .

For all 4 models, the intercept and all 6 effect sizes are highly significant with p<0.001.

The Wald statistic was highly significant for all main fixed effects, both when the effects were fitted in a forward and in a backward sequence (p < 0.001) (Table 4 ).

This analysis revealed a highly significant main effect [ F (1, 140) = 137.23, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.50].

A highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) is shown between the latter two groups.

A highly significant reduction of RRF loss rate from −0.97 ± 0.3 to 0.27 ± 0.4 mL/min/month was observed in patients on incremental PD ( P < 0.001), which was only marginally the case in patients on HD (from −0.99 ± 0.48 to −0.77 ± 0.5 mL/min/month, P = 0.06).

In line with our definition of PSTF, all patients experienced highly significant deterioration ( p < 0.001) of CD severity during the last 6 months before onset of incoBoNT/A therapy ( Figure 1 ).