“highly significant”

Tregs Are Reduced in the Peripheral Blood of Stroke Patients Flow cytometric analysis confirmed the well-described loss of lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of stroke patients, which was highly significant on all days ( p = 0.0035).

The low ACE2/MIRb-ACE2 ratio in the upper aerodigestive tract was highly significant when compared with other locations (p=0.0035, when compared with the lung; p=0.0023 when compared with the large intestine, Student’s t -test).

In addition, when the mean peer marks of group U and M were compared with each other, the observed difference between the marks was highly significant ( p = 0.0035; Student’s t-test).

This difference is highly significant (p<0.0035) in Fisher’s exact test.

We observed a highly significant ( P =0.0035) relationship between lung volume-to-body weight ratios and dynamic lung compliance, indicating that low lung compliance is closely related to LH.

The differences between C1q-deficient and WT mice as well as between sIgM deficient and WT mice were highly significant ( P = 0.0036 and P = 0.0003, respectively).

Comparison of NGS and ddPCR results showed a highly significant correlation (ρ = 0.6047; p = 0.0036; Figure 5 A,B).

Highly Significant positive correlations were also found between SOC and total nitrogen ( p = 0.0036), total phosphorus ( p = 0.0006) and total potassium ( p < 0.0001).

The association between the Bray-Curtis distance matrices for the two data sets was highly significant (P = 0.0036, Mantel test).

The association of AUC prednisone t 0-6 with Gd-IgA1 t 0-6 remained highly significant after adjustment for other immunosuppressants (p = 0.0036).

Using a Fisher’s exact test, it can be calculated that the distribution of proteins with altered versus non-altered protein amounts in the histone group (3 versus 4) was highly significant different from what could be expected among non-histone proteins (41 regulated and 830 non-altered non-histone proteins, p = 0.0036).

This data was confirmed in A431 cells using flow cytometry showing a highly significant 4.5 fold increase in intracellular fluorescence (Fig. 2 ), P = 0.0036.

While smoking remained highly significant, both females (OR = 1.44, P = .0036) and Asians (versus Caucasians, OR = 2.49, P = .00060) were still significantly enriched in the EGFR -mutant group after adjusting for smoking status.

Two-tailed student T-test results indicated highly significant correction of LAMAN enzyme deficiency by rAAV6-LAMAN in comparison to untreated mutants at both time points ( P = 0.0036 and 0.000006, respectively).

The difference between ICCA patients and control individuals was statistically highly significant (p = 0.0036 for ICCA.SRa and p = 0.0001 for ICCA.SRb, Mann-Whitney test; p = 0.0049 for ICCA.SRa and p = 0.0001 for ICCA.SRb, unpaired t-test with Welch's correction).

The use of the Fh16.5 protein generated a highly significant difference between the two groups (p value = 0.003614); as did enolase (p value was 0.02294).

Preference for the rBNBl playback side was highly significant ( P =0.00369) ( Fig. 1 A).

As per Figure 2 , difference in mean proportion ranging 0.0-0.1% included highly significant penicllin and cephalosporin biosynthesis (p=3.69e −3 ) and significant-sulphur relay system (p=0.01), ascorbate and aldarate metabolism (0.02), polyaromatic hydrocarbon degradation (p=0.04), andpropanoate metabolism (p=0.04).

Similarly in linear regression, a highly significant relationship was seen when MCF7 cells were excluded from the analysis (Figure 5 ; p = 0.0037).

The effect on hind legs and quadriceps remained highly significant (Šidák corrected p ≤3.7x10 -3 ).

The results were highly significant between N0/M0 versus N+ (p = 0.0037) as well as N0/M0 versus M+ (p = 0.0022) (Table 2 ).

The association between symptom duration and outcome was highly significant (χ2 = 11.18; df = 2; p = 0.0037), as demonstrated in Table 6 .

Statistical modeling supports the following: the quadratic term of GG is highly significant, both without ATF ( p = 0.0037) and with ATF ( p = 0.0081), while AG-related and interaction terms remain non-significant.

There was a highly significant difference between the two populations (3.6 % (27/747) and 8.6 % (19/222) in control and symptomatic dogs, respectively) ( P = 0.00379).

This was highly significant ( p = 0.0038).