“highly significant”

Survival differences between Car 68 and Chic infected animals were not significant (log-rank; p = 0.1331); however differences in survival between Car 91 versus Car 68 were highly significant (log-rank; p = 0.0082).

LP patients had a higher waist circumference as compared to controls and this difference was highly significant ( P = 0.0082).

The results for the retroflexion movement improved by a highly significant factor ( p = 0.0082); more subjects in the experimental group had results that were in line with the norm.

As was expected, the correlation between the viscosity and product of applied PEEP and FiO 2 was highly significant and almost close to identity (R 2 = 0.9837, p = 0.0082 and R 2 = 0.9955, p = 0.0023 in patents 7 and 8, respectively).

angustifolia , dry weight had values between 0.89 and 3.35 g for those sown in soil and between 0.1 and 2.05 g for those in soil with BGAK with highly significant differences according to t-test two-tailed ( p = 0.0083) (Shapiro-Wilk test soil without BGAK p = 0.451, soil with BGAK p = 0.139; Levene’s test p = 0.117) (Fig. 5 ).

Both of these findings remained highly significant after Bonferroni correction ( P < .0083).

As compared with the infected untreated group with 0% survival, the IN-pre group survival was also highly significant ( P = 0.0084).

Highly significant differences in the number of sclerotia ( P = 0.0084) and diameter of sclerotia ( P = 0.0175) were observed between evaluated fungal isolates (Fig. 1 ).

We have reanalyzed the behavioral results with these birds removed from the dataset, and our findings are still highly significant (p=0.0084). 5) Effects of lesions on amount of singing.

The permutation-based test of correlation revealed a positive and highly significant association between parental relatedness and the proportion of a given brood sired by putative fathers (Spearman’s Rho = 0.38, P = 0.0084; Figure 4 A).

Thus, the elimination rate in females was almost 50%, while males showed almost no elimination; this difference was highly significant (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Test, P = 0.0084).

A correlation analysis between the discrimination index in the NOR and CA1 neuron numbers revealed a highly significant correlation for the distal (Pearson r = 0.7189, p = 0.0084) but no correlation for the proximal CA1 part (Pearson r = 0.2719, p = 0.3926) (Supplemental Fig.

For data from birds tested at 19 weeks of age, the model was highly significant (Likelihood ratio test: chi-square = 13.68, p = 0.0084).

Tree node 2, which separated the enrichment samples from the natural sediment samples and 77CS, represented a highly significant division (p = 0.0084).

At a deeper level, the decrease in the relative abundance of Proteobacteria was mainly reflected in changes in Alphaproteobacteria, with a highly significant decreasing trend in relative abundance from the HH samples to the HA and AA samples (ANOVA, p = 0.0084).

In fact, between 8–30 weeks, the curve of the body-weight kinetics of aP2-ALOX15 mice was consistently below the curve of the wildtype controls, and this difference was statistically highly significant (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.0085).

The survival rates of the different groups of rats were different as the median survival for the group of rats which had received huBcl-2 A15A5 and pCMV A15A5 cells were respectively 10.2 and 15.6 days, a difference, which was highly significant ( P = 0.0086) (figure 3A ).

The difference in overall survival by site of bone involvement among patients ≤40 is highly significant (p=0.0086).

Wilcoxon testing (after 52 weeks of trial) further indicated a highly significant sex difference in the placebo groups (** P = 0.00867, Table S1 ), with the GDS score improving significantly in davunetide-treated females, as compared to the placebo group, at week 52 (* P = 0.0178, Fig. 3C and Table S1 ).

FLT3LG was produced by purified CD4+ T cells (p=0.0623) and by DCs (p=0.1193) 24 hours following stimulation with cGAMP, and this induction became highly significant (p=0.0087) when data from the two cell subsets were combined, as distinct biological replicates, into one analysis ( Fig. 6e ).

The CV-ANOVA revealed that the model was highly significant ( p = 0.008781).

In particular, the height from the dental arch of the leakage or perforation was identified as a highly significant risk factor ( P = 0.0088).

66) is highly significant ( P = 0.0088, χ 2 test).

Also, a highly significant ( p = 0.0088) correlation of volume of solution spread and solution spread in the parapharyngeal space and “medial compartment” was found.

Nine women out of 17 in the vagitocin 400 IU group did not experience the most bothersome symptom after seven weeks of treatment; the corresponding figures were 14 and 13 in the placebo group. The difference in the decrease of the number of women experiencing the most bothersome symptom between the start of treatment and after the seven-week treatment period was highly significant when the results in the vagitocin 400 IU and placebo groups were compared ( p = 0.0089).