Quantitative analysis of the degree of colocalization in multiple samples using the Improvision Openlab software yielded an average Pearson coefficient of 0.506, which is highly significant (P < 0.01).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Mean PD in group 1 was 4.42 mm when compared with group 2 and group 4 where the values were 1.64 and 1.60 mm, respectively, which were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.01).
This deviation was highly significant ( p < 0.01) after 10 days ( Figure 6 B).
As expected, the difference in FCR between the high-FE (1.93 ± 0.05) and the low-FE (3.34 ± 0.01) groups was highly significant ( P value < 0.01).
Highly significant positive correlations were observed between C a and C i , as well as between C a , C i and carbon metabolism-related DEGs ( p <0.01) ( Figure 5B (a, b)).
Discussion Analysis of genotype by environment (G×E) interaction indicated a highly significant interaction (P < 0.01).
Of these interactions, 38% of FUS interactions were significantly changed ( N = 119, p ≤ 0.05), and 20% were highly significant ( N = 63, p ≤ 0.01).
Moreover, the increase in the tensile strength for every 50 MPa step is significant ( p < 0.05) while the decrease in the porosity is highly significant ( p < 0.01).
It was observed that 24 hr samples recorded a higher leakage rate as recorded by dye penetration, three-month samples recorded an intermediate leakage rate, while the one-month samples had a lower leakage rate, and this was highly significant statistically (p < 0.01).
The correlation values between herbage and sheep were highly significant (p<0.01) for K (0.878), Na (0.749), Fe (0.825), Mn (0.951), and Zn (0.916), and between soil and herbage for Fe (0.959) and Mn (0.967).
Variables that were found to be highly significant (p<0.01) included Tm, probe length, GC content, presence of a SNP, average heterozygosity of a SNP, polyA, polyC, polyG, and polyT.
Results (1) The experimental group showed significant (P < 0.05) or highly significant (P < 0.01) differences in the joint angles of the hip, knee, and ankle at key points across all three axes (X, Y, Z) compared to the control group.
Results: Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD), and Student’s t test for statistical significance ( P < 0.05, significant; P < 0.01, highly significant).
The significance levels of each test are reported as significant for p<0.05 (*), as highly significant for p<0.01 (**) and as extremely significant for p<0.001 (***).
The results were assessed as P-value that was differentiated into: non-significant when P-value >0.05, significant when P-value ≤0.05, highly significant when P-value ≤0.01.
Mean differences between different protocols shown with vertical arrows are highly significant (P < 0.01).
For both approaches, CD4 intercept exhibited a highly significant association with the composite outcome in the unadjusted analysis (P <0.01) but did not show an association in the adjusted analyses.
In terms of fats and saturated fats, recipes from TV chefs contain the most (fat: 27.06 g, saturated fat: 9.20 g), but ready meals contain the least (fat: 17.20 g, saturated fat: 6.80 g) the difference between ready meals and Internet recipes being highly significant (fat: 17.20 v 24.80 g, p < 0.01; saturated fat: 6.80 v 8.80 g, p < 0.01).
All correlations were positive, highly significant and higher than 0.71 (p < 0.01).
CAT activity showed highly significant positive correlations ( p < 0.01) with soluble protein content, number of green leaves, underground fresh weight, total root projected area, and number of root forks.
Treatment with α-lipoic acid led to a highly significant ( p < 0.01) increase of this parameter in both ZL and ZDF rats so that the epididymal UCP-1 protein staining was significantly ( p < 0.05) higher in ZDF rats treated with α-lipoic acid than in control ZL rats.
Highly significant differences among genotypes ( p < 0.01) revealed considerable genetic variability in heat stress indices among wheat RILs, which can be vital for breeding programs aimed at improving heat stress tolerance, enabling the selection of genotypes with desirable traits for developing resilient wheat varieties.
In contrast, a weak yet highly significant positive association was found between family size and adolescents' weekend day television entertainment (ρ = 0.098, p < 0.01), with a small effect size (η 2 = 0.009).
A four-way ANOVA of the effect of experimental factors on plant physiological parameters, biomass production, N content, and C:N ratio in plant dry matter ( Table 1 ) showed a statistically highly significant effect of species ( p ≤ 0.01) for most parameters, except C:N ratio where the effect was insignificant.
After immunization, the level of CD4 + T cells in the rAd-E3 and rAd-E3518 were significantly higher compared to that exhibited by the wild-type group ( P >0.05), the rAd-E3518+Quil A group had a highly significant compared with the wild-type control ( P <0.01).