“highly significant”

The breast percentage of broilers among various treatments were found highly significant (p<0.01) and with respect the main component SCP levels, significantly (p<0.01) higher breast percentage values were observed in broilers fed 2.5% and 5% SCP incorporated diets ( Table 4 ).

Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.

Although the whole fungal community did not show significant differences across the three habitat qualities, a highly significant difference was observed between the generalist and specialist fungal communities ( P < .01) ( Fig. 1B ).

In 2017, PL and PD were highly significant correlations (p < 0.01).

Under proinflammatory conditions, the fluorescence of hypericin, 3 or 5 μ M, respectively, is lowered, highly significant for 6 and 7 h incubation with 3 μ M hypericin ( P ≤ 0.01), and significant for the final value at 8 h ( P ≤ 0.05) for 5 μ M hypericin.

Most of the quantitative traits showed highly significant ( P < 0.01 ) variation over years, locations, and year-by-location interactions.

Combining AZD3965 (100 mg/kg BID) and IACS-010759 (0.5 mg/kg QD) revealed a highly significant improvement in time to reach RTV4 ( P < 0.01) in both Farage and Toledo tumour models versus vehicle or either monotherapy (Fig. 5d ).

Although tyramine correlated with only 4 genera ( r > 0.91, p < 0.02), it showed a highly significant positive correlation with the dominant genus Bacillus (0.11–39.58 % abundance, mean 9.95 %; r > 0.92, p < 0.01).

The difference in the reduction of inflammatory markers [CRP, ferritin, Il-6, Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and Neutrophil/Lymphocyte (N/L)], between the two groups was highly significant (p < 0.01) with the reduction in VD group being markedly higher than the NVD group.

At 250 μg/mL, viability increased significantly ( p < 0.05), while at 1000 and 2000 μg/mL, a highly significant increase was observed ( p < 0.01).

This difference between the two subsamples is highly significant (black line in Figure 5 F, p < 0.01 around 80 Hz).

Statistical analysis of DAI scores showed a significant difference ( p < 0.05) between the pPG/ 27-2 and DSS modeling groups, and a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01) between the pPG-pTE/ 27-2 group and the other two.

This trend was highly significant (p<0.01) ( Figure 2 ).

This result signifies a highly significant improvement (p < 0.01) of the EBA-BPNN model over the BA-BPNN model.

When these data points were removed, the relationship between crop duration and total yield was highly significant (n=10, r=0.76, p<0.01).

The significance was considered as significant at P < 0.05 (*) and highly significant at P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.001 (***), and P < 0.0001 (****).

All the factor loadings were highly significant ( p < 0.01).

The association of grade and the incidence of EGFR mutation remains highly significant in multivariable analysis, with crude OR of 5.0 and adjusted OR of 4.7 (both p = 0.01, Table 2 ).

This was further confirmed through Spearman’s rank correlation between subjective numbness and Level A or B objective response to neurosensory testing, which showed a positive (Spearman’s rho–0.441) and highly significant correlation ( p < 0.01) ( Table 4 ).

The MNL analysis indicated that effects of age, level of education, livestock holding, access to climate information and access to extension services in determining perception levels were found statistically highly significant (P < 0.01) (Table 4 ).

The overall regression equation was highly significant, p<.01, and the 28% of the IDAS score variance was explained by the combined effect of gender, monthly income, and type of heart implantation device.

BMI was found to be a highly significant predictor variable associated with CHD (odds ratio = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.94–0.99; P = 0.01) (Supplementary Table 3, Supplemental digital content 1, http://links.lww.com/CAEN/A31 ).

Furthermore, the number of study terms is positive and highly significant (p < 0.01) (Table 2 ), which indicates that medical students perceive the standard of care increasingly better over the course of their studies.

The main effect of frame was also highly significant, F (1, 156) = 8.0, p < 0.01.

Differences were presented as significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.