534, −0.032, 0.522, 0.242, 0.592, and 0.547, respectively, which are highly significant at three instances ( P < 0.01).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 abundance alterations demonstrated significant associations with host immune responses and intestinal barrier function, exhibiting positive correlations with serum immunoglobulins (IgA, IgM; P < 0.05) and tight junction proteins (jejunal/ileal Claudin1/ZO-1, jejunal Occludin; P < 0.05), while showing negative correlations with systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6; P < 0.05), ileal IL-1β/IL-6 ( P < 0.05), and highly significant inverse correlations ( P < 0.01) with oxidative stress markers (TNF-α, MDA) and compartment-specific inflammation (duodenal IL-6/TNF-α, jejunal IL-6).
Figure 4 shows that the majority of the clusters (51.20%) were very highly significant ( p < 0.01), with the clusters found all over the study area but at increasing numbers near the health facilities.
Importantly, the difference in CD68 expression between the MSC-Exo group and PBS group is highly significant ( P < 0.01) ( Figure 2(b) ). 3.5.
Age and facial postures were highly significant (P<0.01, Table 1 ), and these two factors showed significant interaction (P<0.01).
The difference in overall data transferred for each patient was highly significant (p < 0.01).
Differences between groups were considered statistically significant when the p-value was less than 0.05 ( p < 0.05) and highly significant when the p-value was below 0.01 ( p < 0.01).
The degree of significance is represented on each graph by stars *** p <0.001 (highly significant); ** p <0.01 (very significant) * p <0.05 (significant)The open field test: Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Salvia Officinalis L. methanolic extracts reduce the time of immobility and increase the time spent in the center of the open field arena.
However, the two combinations, NP + P and NP + P + L of SG10, caused a highly significant increase in FLuc activity compared with the native LaSota strain ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 6A ).
The Student t -test showed a highly significant difference (Student t -test, p < 0.01).
The results were considered significant if p values were <0.05, and highly significant if p<0.01.
Again, we saw significant correlations between the percentage of bone regrowth and ABR thresholds (regrowth = 1.04–2.15 × ABR threshold; adjusted r-squared = 0.59, p < 0.05) ( Figure 3C ) and a highly significant correlation for c+VEMP amplitudes (regrowth = 1.15–2.63 × c+VEMP amplitude; adjusted r-squared = 0.91, p < 0.01) ( Figure 3D ).
There was no difference between p-glucose or HbA1c between the groups, but a highly significant difference in C peptide p<0.01 was observed.
Comparison of hemodynamic monitoring indicato Comparing the hemodynamic parameters between the two groups, PEP, LVET, FTC and heart rate showed highly significant statistical differences ( t = 5.655, z = -4.368, z = -3.702, t = -4.127; p < 0.01) (Table 3 ).
If the same association was 1.) supported by three different tests, 2.) was highly significant for at least one of them ( p ≤ 0.01), and 3.) was shared by the females and males of the same species or even by different species, then we deemed the outcome as reliable and reported it in detail.
IL-10 and TNF-α have highly significant differences between the DI group and the CK group ( p < 0.01).
Our results showed that moderately to highly significant differentiations ( P < 0.01) were found between pop.8 and all other eight greenhouse populations (Table S2).
They found that, in comparison to controls, there was a highly significant decrease (P < 0.01) in T3 and T4 levels and an increase in TSH levels [ 11 ].
The increase in Dnmt3L expression was highly significant between 10 dpp and 15 dpp (p < 0.01) and showed the greatest fold increase observed for any of the genes or timepoints.
Only highly significant (in the order of p < 0.01) results were chosen to be assessed for their prognostic value in a clinical setting.
Furthermore, based on the correlation analysis, the content of regaloside A and regaloside K have a highly significant effect on the color change (ΔE) of lily bulbs ( p < 0.01), which showed a positive correlation with brightness, but a negative correlation with a* value.
Inter-group analysis (Table 4 - see PDF) further confirmed that from 1 month onwards, Group A reported significantly better VAS scores compared to Group B, with the difference being highly significant at 3 months and 6 months (p < 0.01).
Compared with the 0 μg/ml group, the difference in the 5 μg/ml group was significant, and the difference in the 10 μg/ml group was highly significant ( P < 0.01, P < 0.001, Fig. 2 B).
As shown in Table 3 , the overall effect of time on S i was highly significant ( P < 0.01).
Anosimetric analysis indicated a highly significant difference in ileal microbial β-diversity between the 35-d CON and TA3 groups ( P < 0.01).