“highly significant”

Compared to Single CT_Origin+MLP, our proposed model shows highly significant improvements in both AUC (12.5% increase, p <0.01) and ACC (13% increase, p <0.05), validating the value of dual-input fusion (CT_Origin+CT_ROI).

Dramatic increase of LTB4 in JXwn06-infected pigs was detected with highly significant difference compared to those of control group on day 5 PI to moribund ( p < 0.01), and was significantly different from those of HB-1/3.9-infected group ( p < 0.05).

The treatments (Vinasse levels) and the interactions are also highly significant ( P < 0.01), confirming that vinasse applications significantly altered trait expression.

* indicates significant correlation between protein and quality traits ( P < 0.05), ** indicates highly significant association ( P < 0.01).

The differences in infection intensity and rate between the lpg2 − and the WT were statistically highly significant ( P <0.01).

While infected dead bird counts only explain about 40% of reported human cases in California, it is a highly significant predictor ( p = 0.01).

The differences in viral replication between group A (4.99 ± 0.24 log geq/ml after one week and 6.98 ± 0.29 log geq/ml after two weeks) and group B (< 3.70 log geq/ml after one week and 3.87 ± 0.09 log geq/ml after two weeks) and between group A and group C (< 3.70 log geq/ml after one week and < 3.70 log geq/ml after two weeks) were highly significant ( p < 0.01).

Notably, Ca-Cd and Re-Cd showed significant negative correlations with SOM ( P < 0.05), whereas Ex-Cd and OM-Cd exhibited highly significant negative correlations with SOM ( P < 0.01).

2 , a one-way ANOVA was conducted on batting accuracy in the retention test and the transfer test, and the between-group F = 10.324, p < 0.01, for the three groups in the retention test was highly significant; in the transfer test, the between-group F = 12.311, p < 0.01, and the between-group difference was highly significant.

Statistically, these difference were highly significant for the numbers of affected lung lobes and lung-associated lymph nodes, as well as the lymph node, lung, and total pathology scores (P<0.01).

A highly significant ( p < 0.01) reduction in surface microhardness was observed in group I (beverage without CaGP).

As shown in Figure 4 C, the weighted UniFrac distances between cats in the probiotic group were greater than those between the control groups, and the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.01). 3.6.

Days to Maturity The faba bean variety and intra-row spacing had a highly significant ( p < 0.01) influence on days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, and plant height.

It was highly significant ( p < .01) that four linear parameters ( X 1 , X 2 , X 3 , and X 4 ) and all quadratic parameters were presented in the model.

If the Anova tests reported significant ( p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.01) differences, the groups of data were further compared with each other by using Student’s t -tests to uncover the individual data groups that differed significantly or highly significantly from the others. 3.

AMMI's stability value (ASV) was calculated to rank genotypes in terms of stability using the following equation [ 6 ]: (6) A M M I s t a b i l i t y v a l u e ( A S V ) = [ S S I P C A 1 ( I P C A 1 s c o r e ) S S I P C A 2 ] + [ I P C A 2 s c o r e ] 2 3 Results 3.1 Analyses of variance and performance of the genotypes Single-site ANOVA revealed highly significant (P < 0.01) differences among the 18 soybean genotypes for grain yield in each of the test locations, except in Mokwa and Sabuwa ( Table 4 ).

The difference between the attitudes of parents who had and did not have their children vaccinated against COVID-19 was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.01, Table 3 ).

The differences were statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05 and highly significant at p ≤ 0.01.

However, at days 14 and 21, such differences became highly significant ( P <0.01) as the majority of vaccinated birds (16/18 and 15/18, at 14 and 21 days, respectively) had no detectable serum antibody as compared to only 3/10 and 1/10 unvaccinated chickens at the respective days.

The difference was highly significant ( P < 0.01), which indicated that the EPC cell adhesion ability of the mutant ∆ dotU decreased significantly.

There was a clinically relevant and statistically highly significant difference ( P <0.01, Wilcoxon's Signed Rank Test) between the pre- and post-vaccination Rubella IgG GMTs.

ERN1 exhibited elevated expression compared to the control, with a significant difference at the tenth week ( p < 0.05) and a highly significant difference at the 20th week ( p < 0.01).

It produced a highly significant normalization of γ -GT (45.18 ± 5.27 U/L, p < 0.01), representing a 43.7% reduction compared to the positive control group.

Effect of pre-treatment on mineral content in Brassica Napus L The findings showed that chitosan pretreatment had highly significant effects ( p < 0.01) on sodium and potassium levels in canola under salt stress.

Comparison of inoculation methods for Phytophthora blight resistance showed highly significant correlation ( r = 0.9150 for the root inoculation method and r = 0.8384, p < 0.01 for foliar spray method, data unpublished).