“highly significant”

30 However, by 9 months, 3Mixtatin showed a highly significant increase in sinus tract formation ( p < 0.01), potentially due to statin-induced cytotoxicity at higher concentrations, thereby suppressing their regenerative potential (Okamoto et al.). 31 Radiographically, criteria including pathologic root resorption, furcal radiolucency, and PDL widening Table 2 showed no intergroup differences at 3 or 6 months.

Differences were considered significant at P<0.05 and highly significant at P<0.01 1 .

The test probability was considered significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.

Notably, ANOVA analysis for females indicated highly significant differences between the calculated and actual ages across all age segments (P<0.01).

D2 had highly significant positive correlation with SM and SP ( P < 0.01), but significantly negatively correlation with AK and BD ( P < 0.01).

7 D , 67% decrease from CTRL to 10D TTX, 51% decrease at 5D TTX), which was highly significant as a one-way ANOVA ( F = 8.94, p < 0.01) and represented a significant shift with deprivation from age-matched CTRL ( p = 0.02 vs 5D TTX 3D recovery; p < 0.01 vs 10D TTX 3D recovery) although not between the two deprived conditions ( p = 0.53).

According to the TNF-α results of serum and articular fluid, statistically significant differences existed between the GO group and the UCMSCs group ( P < 0.05), highly significant statistical difference existed in the blank group ( P < 0.01), and no significant statistical difference existed in the GO + UCMSCs group ( P > 0.05).

Moreover, highly significant differences were reported ( p < 0.01), when 1-pentanol, nonanal, and 1-octen-3-ol were omitted, respectively.

2 , a one-way ANOVA was conducted on batting accuracy in the retention test and the transfer test, and the between-group F = 10.324, p < 0.01, for the three groups in the retention test was highly significant; in the transfer test, the between-group F = 12.311, p < 0.01, and the between-group difference was highly significant.

Comparing caregivers in woredas providing iCCM services to caregivers in those providing routine CCM services, highly significant differences ( P < 0.01) were found for caregivers reporting poor service by the HEW or at the health post and challenges in obtaining transportation to the health post.

Results: When comparing chlorhexidine with the essential oil mouth rinse, the reduction in VSCs was highly significant in the chlorhexidine group ( P <0.01).

A significant difference was defined at P < 0.05, and a highly significant difference was defined at P < 0.01 (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01).

ANB, mandibular body length and facial convexity were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.01) whereas condylion to point A, nasal airway and total airway volume ( P < 0.05) were statistically significant.

Results Fig leaf extract had an obvious inhibitory effect on Fusarium , and the difference was significant ( P < 0.05) or highly significant ( P < 0.01).

Thus, 2% sodium fluoride showed significant reduction (p<0.05) in hypersensitivity from baseline on 0-day and 15th day for all stimuli, with both tactile and air blast test showing highly significant (p<0.01) reduction on day 15.

Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05, and highly significant difference was considered at p < 0.01.

It is evident that there is a significant (P < 0.05) or highly significant positive correlation (P < 0.01) between Pb-Cd, Pb-Hg, Cd-Hg, and Hg-As, indicating that Pb, Cd, Hg, and As are homologous.

For instance, a highly significant positive correlation was identified between His and ketones ( p < .01), whereas His exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with aldehydes and amines ( p < .01).

Particularly, there was a highly significant negative effect of the residuals on the germination rates at high concentrations ( p < 0.01).

Moreover, all three treatment groups when comparison with infected group showed highly significant increase in on the 7th, 14th, 21st, 35th, and 42nd days after treatment ( p < 0.01; Figure 4B ).

PSS and highly significant: R = 0.39, n = 90, p < 0.01; consistent with the results of the binary graph analysis. wt − Eff vs.

The analysis of data from the 2nd time point revealed that prosocial motivation was also highly significant and positively associated with meaning in military service (MOT&MMS, r = 0.705, p < 0.01) as well as with role fit (MOT&RLF, r = 0.695, p < 0.01).

An asterisk (*) indicates significant differences, where ‘*’ represents significant differences at P < 0.05, and ‘**’ represents highly significant differences at P < 0.01.

Specifically, commissioning is highly significant ( p < 0.01) in Models M1, M2 and M4 (full sample, hospitals with more than 50 beds and general hospitals larger than 50 beds).

Compared with that in the pre-laying period, a highly significant increase in the level of sodium and ionized calcium during the laying period was observed ( P < 0.01) while there was a highly statistically significant decrease regarding the sO 2 , K, Hct, and Hb values ( P < 0.01).