“highly significant”

According to statistical analyses (see Figure 8 D–F), highly significant differences in cytotoxicity were found between the two types of treatment ( p < 0.01).

Likewise, the effect of parity of ewe on milk traits was highly significant (p<0.01).

Differences were considered significant at P <0.05 and highly significant at P <0.01.

The sparsely and densely rakered morphs showed highly significant differences in these measures (t-test: P <0.01).

The significance level was set at P < 0.05, with highly significant differences defined as P < 0.01.

The declines in chlorophyll a content and carotenoid content showed similar trends, especially in treatments with 20 mg DBP kg −1 , as shown by the significant differences compared to the controls ( p < 0.05) and highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) in Figure 1 a.

Data were considered significant at p<0.05 (*), highly significant at p<0.01 (**), and very highly significant at p<0.001 (***).

The difference is highly significant ( P < 0.01) showing that response with Kin was an order of magnitude greater than with Random.

A conclusion was drawn from the correlation analysis, that is RLD and SA always maintained a highly significant negative correlation with RL over two years (p < 0.01).

The YPI-R3 [ 10 ] demonstrated solid psychometric properties where highly significant correlations ( p < 0.01) were found between the ten subscales of the YPI-R3 and the 15 subscales/scales of Mini-International Personality Item Pool (IPIP), Gratitude Scale, Depression, Anxiety and Stress (DASS-21), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ), and Eating Loss of Control Scale (ELOCS) with separate ratings of mothers and fathers [ 10 ].

Similarly, TBARS showed a highly significant positive correlation with shear force ( p < 0.01).

Regarding to Embryo weight at 14 days of incubation (Table 3 ) was highly significant increased ( P < 0.01) when spraying TTO and LavO at low or high dosage on fertilized eggshell surface directly upon collection compared to the untreated group or FF group.

8b , the second response was smaller on average on adding Krebs solution (R2/R1 = 0.73 ± 0.10, n = 33) but was consistently increased after adding 10 μM retigabine (R2/R1 = 1.18 ± 0.04, n = 24); the difference between retigabine and Krebs’ solution was highly significant ( P < 0.01).

Furthermore, based on the correlation analysis, the content of regaloside A and regaloside K have a highly significant effect on the color change (ΔE) of lily bulbs ( p < 0.01), which showed a positive correlation with brightness, but a negative correlation with a* value.

On the genus level, Escherichia/Shigella -normalized read counts differed highly significant between T1 and T2 (pvalue <0.01) as well as between T1 and T3 (pvalue <0.01) ( Figure 5A ).

Sodium valproate (400 mg/kg) increased the latency to 142.50 ± 5.65 s which was highly significant ( P < 0.01) when compared to control.

Differences were considered significant at * P < 0.05 and highly significant at ** P < 0.01.

The differences were considered significant for * P <0.05 and highly significant for ** P <0.01.

Analysis of Variance ANOVA revealed highly significant difference (P < 0.01) in young aged labial tissues and significant (P ≤ 0.05) in gingival and not significant (P > 0.05) in inferior surface of tongue and in hard palatal tissues.

The data were considered significant if P < 0.05, highly significant if P < 0.01 and very highly significant if P < 0.001.

Effective coverage rates were 87.4% in urban cluster and 95.3% in rural clusters, and the difference was highly significant ( z = 3.57, P < 0.01).

P < 0.05 was considered a significant difference and highly significant when P < 0.01.

The reduction in craving was highly significant ( n = 20, p < 0.01) in heavy drinkers [ 33 ].

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant effect of Dex ( p < 0.01).

Differences were declared significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.