“highly significant”

Regression (E l(0) = 0.59 × ME intake—310.7) was highly significant ( p < 0.01), and the R 2 value was 0.66.

Differences were statistically significant comparing P1 with P2 ( P <0.05) and highly significant comparing P1 with the subsequent passages ( P <0.01) (Figure 2 ).

Genetic verification: Among the genes associated with the MAPK signaling pathway, the experimental group exhibited significantly elevated expression levels of stress-related genes HSPA1A, HSPA2, MAPK11 , and CRYAB compared to the control group, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.01).

In the 1950s, these four geographical populations showed relatively high genetic differentiation, with values ranging from 0.8847 to 0.9356, and highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) ( Table S10 ).

Differences were considered as statically significant at p ≤ 0.05 and highly significant at p ≤ 0.01, unless otherwise stated. 3.

Highly significant differences were found between employed and unemployed participants for all CFQoL domains except treatment issues and concerns for the future ( p < 0.01).

In the hepatopancreas ( Figure 5 B), both Mn-HexA1 and Mn-HexA2 displayed a highly significant increase in expression from stage He1 (hepatopancreas in O1 stage) to He2 (hepatopancreas in O2 stage) ( p < 0.01), reaching peak levels at He2 stage that were substantially higher than all other developmental stages ( p < 0.01).

All three models produced strong correlations (0.9 > adjusted R 2 > 0.7) and highly significant results ( P < 0.01).

Where the initial test indicates significance ( p < 0.05 was considered significant, and p < 0.01 was considered highly significant), either the Benjamini–Hochberg False Discovery Rate post hoc test or the Bonferroni correction post hoc test was chosen to control for type-I errors, dependent on the dimension of the contingency table.

A * p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and highly significant when ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 (two-tailed tested). 3.

Groups 3 (ANP-5FU), 4 (ANP-Ag-5FU) and 5 (free 5-FU) all showed a statistically highly significant increase in leukocyte count ( p < 0.01 or p < 0.001).

The ns indicated no significant difference, the symbols * and ** indicated significant difference ( P < 0.05 ) and highly significant difference ( P < 0.01 ), respectively.

The Spearman’s correlations between the liver enzymes (AST, ALT, and GGT) were almost always highly significant ( p < 0.01) between them and within hospitalization thresholds (admission, 7 days, and discharge) ( Supplementary Table S1 ).

The Model ANOVA results showed that the model is highly significant ( F = 45.00, p < 0.01), providing evidence for the overall predictive power of the model.

The difference between group A and D was highly significant (p < 0.01).

Due to the apparent increase in type III collagen mRNA levels in patients with primary inguinal hernia the ratio of type I to type III collagen mRNA levels in these patients were markedly reduced and showed highly significant differences compared to the controls (0.59 ± 0.06 versus 0.90 ± 0.08; p < 0.01).

In the present experiment, the difference between tributyrin treatment means was considered highly significant at P < 0.01 and significant at 0.01 ≤ P < 0.05, while 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10 was considered a tendency.

The difference in CFU/mL between values obtained after dental units had undergone disinfecting cycles and values at baseline was highly significant (F = 178.8; p < .01).

Pairwise Kruskal–Wallis test for alpha diversity indices showed highly significant ( p < 0.01) differences in alpha diversity between all microhabitats in most cases.

There was no statistical difference between the groups on day 0 or at 1 week (p>0.05), whereas highly significant differences favoring the study group were observed at 1 month and 3 months (p<0.01) ( Table 4 ).

Additionally, SL, LA, and LN displayed highly significant correlations ( r ranged from 0.50 to 0.75, P < 0.01).

Interestingly, we observed that nuclear genetic distance was strongly correlated with mitochondrial distance (r = 0.581, p < 0.01; Table 2 and Figure S2 ), and this relationship remained highly significant after controlling any other variables ( p < 0.01; Table 2 ), suggesting a pattern of isolation by colonization.

Mean differences between different protocols shown with vertical arrows are highly significant (P < 0.01).

The difference in the use of auxiliaries between the two groups of learners was highly significant (t = 3.576; p < 0.01), as well as in the use of clausal complements ( t = 2.591, p < 0.05), parataxis ( t = 2.672, p < 0.05), and the indirect object ( t = 2.355, p < 0.05).

In comparison with the control group, the unbuffering-packaged treated group kept a lower chlorophyll content, with highly significant differences during the shelf life 10–20 ( p < 0.01).