Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Indeed, intersecting the positively correlated genes with all genes that encode for chromatin binding proteins, or epifactors ( https://epifactors.autosome.ru/ ), showed highly significant enrichment (Fig 4B , green, 44 genes, fold‐enrichment = 2.33, P < 10 −7 , Fisher's exact test).
highly significantp < 0.00000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As shown in Figure 4 A, a one-way ANOVA with 10 levels of Dream-Age (1–10 years) as independent variable and current (log) nightmare recall as dependent variable revealed a highly significant main effect ( F 9,17004 = 6.08, p < 0.0000001) showing that earlier recalled dreams were associated with frequent current nightmares.
The Stress Acceleration Hypothesis of Nightmares.
Front Neurol · 2017 · PMC5451501
highly significantp<10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
If we obtain the average expression for all those RBRs and we compared it with the average for the HECT genes, the Pearson correlation coefficient for the expression values in the 79 tissues is positive and highly significant (r = 0.82, p<10 −7 ).
Evolution of plant HECT ubiquitin ligases.
PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3712016
highly significantp < 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The test showed highly significant correlations for all four locations (C6‐r: tau = 0.52, p < 10 −7 ; C6‐l: tau = 0.52, p < 10 −7 ; C5‐r: tau = 0.53, p < 10 −7 ; C5‐l: tau = 0.50, p < 10 −6 ), confirming a statistically significant increase in the diameter with age for all four locations.
highly significantp < 0.00000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Introduction of ACP filler into resins resulted in modest, though highly significant (two-sample independent t -test), reduction of DVC in all systems: 9.7% in the Bis-GMA group ( p < 0.0000001), 7.1% in the EBPADMA group ( p < 0.000003), and 5.4% in the UDMA group ( p < 0.00007).
Bioactive Polymeric Materials for Tissue Repair.
J Funct Biomater · 2017 · PMC5371877
highly significantP <10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis carried out on the timing errors, pooled over all subjects after averaging over all repetitions of each condition (four-way ANOVA, 3 [viewing distance] x 5 [ball descent duration] x 2 [figure type] x 6 [character type]), showed highly significant effects of character type ( F 5,1168 = 113.188, P <10 −7 ) and figure type ( static versus dynamic , F 1,1168 = 25.180, P <10 −6 ), less significant effects of viewing distance ( F 2,1168 = 3.602, P <0.05) and of the interaction between character type and figure type ( F 5,1168 = 2.569, P <0.05).
highly significantp<.00000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A 2-way ANOVA on proportion of correct recalls revealed no main effect of group (F(1,34) = 3.51, p = .065, r = .25), but a highly significant effect of type of Encoding (F(1,34) = 44.45, p<.0000001, r = .75), and a significant interaction between Group and type of Encoding (F(1,34) = 9.14, p<.005, r = .46).