“highly significant”

Highly significant, nearly perfect positive correlations ( p < 0.01) were found between n P and n T for August 2014 (r = 0.9764), December 2014 to January 2015 (r = 0.9764), and June 2015 (r = 0.9988) across the sampling points in Southern Tagalog ( Figure 5 ).

In addition, the statistical analysis using One-way ANOVA ( Table 2 ) revealed that the difference between the two groups was highly significant ( p < 0.01).

A total of 43.4% of the loci showed heterozygote deficiency with 33.5% and 9.9% showing highly significant ( p < 0.01) and significant (0.01 < p < 0.05) deviation, respectively.

These differences were statistically highly significant ( t test, p < .01).

Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05 and highly significant at the level of P < 0.01, and tendencies were accepted when 0.05 < P < 0.1. 3.

Differences were statistically labeled as significant [*] for p < 0.05 or highly significant [**] for p < 0.01.

Under the “yield” parameter for RE extracts ( Table 2 ), the correlations between yield and TPC/TFC were negative and highly significant ( P < 0.01).

Results: There was a highly significant difference seen for the intergroup comparison of post PI ( P < 0.01) and post GI ( P < 0.01) with least mean in Group 3.

Spatial autocorrelation of the COVID-19 The Global Moran’s I statistics of spatial autocorrelation showed that all four factors considered for hotspot analysis of the COVID-19 were clustered and the results were also highly significant ( p value < 0.01) (Table 1 , Fig. 10 ).

Results: Serum levels of 25 (OH) vitamin D recorded a highly significant difference between the studies groups (20,76±6,31 ng/ml in group I vs. 24,37±9,05ng/ml in group II vs. 24,57±6,45ng/ml in group III, p<0,01).

Regarding the co-expression of BAX with myeloid cell surface markers in AML patients, there was a highly significant negative correlation between BAX expression rates and CD7 ( P =0.01).

Differences between means were considered significant if p -values < 0.05 which is indicated in the figures by (*), highly significant if p -values < 0.01 which is indicated by (**) and very highly significant if p -values < 0.001 which is indicated by (***).

Treatment effects were highly significant ( P < 0.01) on all variables except for the significant ( P < 0.05) effects on lip region width and median bulb width.

Differences were considered significant if P <0.05 (*) and highly significant if P < 0.01 (**).

The co-solvent type and C/OS ratio factors were highly significant ( p < 0.01), whereas the surfactant type did not have a significant effect on the ORR ( p = 0.396).

In addition, all factor and item loadings in this model were large and highly significant (from 0.45 to 0.89, p < 0.01).

In the early weaning group, 90% of the infants were formula-fed, in the appropriate weaning group it was only 50%, which was highly significant ( p < 0,01).

30 , 31 , 32 While there are no studies on the link between total IgE and basopenia, a recent report showed a weak, but highly significant, positive correlation between total IgE levels and eosinophil numbers ( r = 0.275, P < 0.01). 32 Previous studies reported significant positive correlations between serum total IgE and basophil FcɛRI expression levels. 18 , 33 Elevated levels of D-Dimer and CRP, also markers of high inflammatory activity in CSU, were reported not to be linked to total IgE.

Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for comparison of 2 time points and the Spearman test for correlation ( P < .05, significant; P < .01, highly significant).

In these mice, oxaliplatin caused a highly significant ( p < 0.01) preference towards a colder plate of the two used in the experiment involving 30–35 °C ( Figure 1 G) and 40–45 °C ( Figure 1 I).

In contrast, pregnant mice from RV group showed a highly significant decrease in the uterus weight ( p < 0.01) with almost 50% decline compared with SV group.

There were highly significant differences in all the features: AVG (1.88 × 10 −1 ± 0.20 × 10 −1 m/s 2 and 1.87 × 10 −2 ± 7.37 × 10 −3 m/s 2 , p < 0.01), VGM (1.12 × 10 −1 ± 1.94 × 10 −1 (m/s 2 ) 2 and 3.24 × 10 −4 ± 2.07 × 10 −3 (m/s 2 ) 2 , p < 0.01), FS (1.83 ± 1.56 (m/s 2 )/Hz and 1.85 × 10 −1 ± 9.40 × 10 −2 (m/s 2 )/Hz, p < 0.01),AJJI (1.22 ± 1.72 × 10 −1 s and 1.12 ± 1.80 × 10 −1 s, p < 0.01), and VJI (2.19 × 10 −1 ± 1.93 × 10 −1 s 2 and 1.70 × 10 −2 ± 2.80 × 10 −2 s 2 , p < 0.01). 3.3.

The differences were defined as significant at P<0.05 and highly significant at P<0.01.

The statistical difference was considered as significant at p≤0.05 and highly significant at p≤0.01.

The results obtained under the factors analysis that included the auxin picloram and the cytokinin 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) showed a highly significant difference as well in their interaction ( p < 0.01).