Highly significant correlations with the fractional absorptions were found between FePP and ASP-p ( r = 0.92, P < 0.0001) in study I and FeSO 4 and ASP-p ( r = 0.52, P < 0.02) in study II ( Figure 4C ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Suppression of HIP-1, HTT, and SP-1 by miR-128a mimic (55%, 36%, and 30% respectively) was highly significant compared to the negative control (NC) (p < 0.0001 by One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison).
Both subject groups showed highly significant improvements between the mKFT and KF ( p < 0.0001), and the difference between the two groups was minimal when the gaze was incorporated ( p > 0.99).
The mortality was not significantly different between patients with and without complications ( P = 0.52), while there was a highly significant difference in LOS between subjects with and without complications (median, 6 versus 18 days, respectively, P < 0.0001).
Using RT–qPCR primers that distinguish wild type (WT) and KCNQ2 ∆E5 , we found a highly significant difference, with KCNQ2 ∆E5 detected exclusively in patient samples ( P < 0.0001 adjusting for age, sex and RNA integrity number (RIN); Supplementary Table 2 ), while the levels of WT KCNQ2 transcript were not different ( P = 0.9947 adjusting for age, sex and RIN; Supplementary Table 2 ) (Fig. 2f,g ).
ANOSIM analysis confirmed a highly significant difference among the four microbial community structures ( R = 0.81; P = 0.0001) and the performed test showed significant differences in the pairwise comparisons of the sites with R values approaching 1 in most of the cases ( Table 3 ).
Two-tailed test of independence indicated that the associations between the mortality and PBO pre-exposure are highly significant (χ 2 = 134.104, df = 1, p < 0.0001).
Although this association lessened somewhat in the adjusted model, it remained highly significant and strong (AOR = 6.08, 95% CI: 3.14-11.78, p < 0.0001).
The difference in relative expression between cultures with #UFA and #C14 was overall highly significant ( p -value <0.0001).
The data suggest a progressive mean rise in serum PLAP-like AP with increased smoking. This trend is highly significant (P=0.0001) as determined by a Wilcoxon rank regression test (Cuzick, in press).
The preference for reachable locations was highly significant ( χ 2 test, two nearest LEDs against the three farthest ones, P<0.0001).
Nonparametric tests for correlation confirmed that the negative relationship between log e -transformed deviations and population size was highly significant (Spearman rank-order correlation: ρ = −0.23, p < 0.0001; Kendall's τ: ρ = −0.17, p < 0.0001; N = 342).
Survival analyses showed highly significant associations between early interim PET and progression-free survival ( P < 0.0001) and overall survival ( P < 0.03).
When represented as proportions of each individual study population there was a highly significant difference between the proportion of aged individuals and young individuals across GBM clinical trials (17% vs. 82% respectively, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4 A).
The difference in pre-injury and post-injury cesarean sections was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
The difference between the ER values, when related to the site of metastasis, was statistically highly significant (P<0.0001) (Table III), whereas the differences between the PR values did not reach this level of statistical significance.
All comparisons between coffee rhizospheres were highly significant: INT-Coffee x ORG-Coffee p<0.0001, df = 39; INT-Coffee x TRN-Coffee p = 0.0002, df = 39; and ORG-Coffee x TRN-Coffee p<0.0001, df = 39.
Further analysis comparing the treatment to the sham control revealed highly significant increases in NO production for all the wavelengths, with all the conditions being statistically different from the respective sham controls ( p < 0.0001). 3.2.
(1989), in the only other report examin- ing the relationship between SPF and c-erbB-2 expression in infiltrating tumours, found a highly significant (P=0.0001) association between c-erbB-2 and high SPF using Chi- squared analysis, but did not report a correlation coefficient.
A simple model just using the information from the most highly associated CpG probe (cg08654655) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.225, ROC AUC 0.80, n = 203).
Consumption of 15 g alcohol or more per day was associated with a relative risk of 1.6 (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.0) and there was evidence of a highly significant increase in risk with increasing reported alcohol consumption (Mantel extension χ for linear trend = 4.2, P <0.0001).
The amount of residual disease following primary laparotomy was also highly significant (X22 = 40.8, P<0.0001).
The results showed highly significant (( P < 0.0001) linear correlations ( r = 0.9784–0.9907) between the Trp values determined by GC and HPLC for both the low-normal and normal-high ranges (data not shown) and between the Trp values determined by GC and the standard fluorimetric method ( r = 0.9774) (Fig. 2 ).
Comparison of survival curves of the two cohorts of mice revealed a highly significant prolonged survival for TRAMP mice (p<0.0001).
In Table 1 , the linear effect of BMI in the Cox model for men is insignificant ( p = 0.876), but the test of PH assumption is highly significant ( p = 0.0001).