“highly significant”

By contrast, intergroup comparisons revealed that the differences between groups A and B regarding LTP and neurogenesis were consistently highly significant (LTP, t test, P = 0.0001; chi-square test, P = 0.0028; neurogenesis, t test, P = 0.0002; chi-square test, P = 0.006) confirming that the patterns are indeed different.

For bromine, a statistically highly significant difference was observed between the two groups, with much lower values in the patient group: 1086 ± 244 μg/L vs. 4137 ± 770 μg/L ( p < 0.0001).

colemani in Spring Cucumbers A repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that the main effect of DACT was highly significant ( F = 219.78, df = 3, 1347, p < 0.0001), as was the interaction between treatment and DACT ( F = 53.97, df = 6, 1344, p < 0.0001), indicating significant temporal variation and treatment effects over time.

At t = 80 min, normalized transfer into the lymphatic region followed the ordering 10 kDa > 70 kDa > Bodipy FL C16 > 2000 kDa dextran, with overall differences across dyes highly significant ( P < 0.0001, Brown–Forsythe and Welch ANOVA with Dunnett's T3 multiple comparisons) ( Fig. 5D ).

Statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon test confirmed that the differences between ODHP and ODHP-NS at 1/2 MIC and 1/4 MIC were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

We found a strong and highly significant correlation (Fig. 1F ; R 2 = 0.59, p < 0.0001) indicating that B7-H3 can be used to assess the T:S by flow cytometry.

The onset of TAO within 2 years after the treatment with RAI and the titer of TSHR-Abs The relation between the onset of orbitopathy symptoms in patients with GD during a two-year of follow-up after a therapeutic dose of 131 I and the titer of TSHR-Abs in the serum was highly significant ( P <0.0001).

Intimal and medial pSmad-2/3 percentage expression was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) compared to adventitia layers across all arterial sizes (100–1000 μm) ( p < 0.5) ( Figure 2 B–E).

However, that for the ‘Fiction’ condition is highly significant (r 2 = 0.388; F 1,39 = 24.75, p < 0.0001).

The regression model is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), but the out-of-fit phase is not significant, with R 2 of 0.9741, indicating that the model fits well and can reasonably predict the taxanes yield within the ranges of the variables [ 33 ].

However, hypomimia and speech impairment from V0 to V24M in males but not in females was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 4 ).

For water absorption ( Table 2 ), the overall model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

However there was a highly significant difference between both groups regarding mean ± SD of CSAd, CSAp, ∆ CSA, and mean CSApd ( p = 0.0001) (Table 1 ).

It is noteworthy that TOTINJ is indeed highly significant if HIGH6MO is excluded from the full model (p < 0.0001 for TOTINJ under this scenario).

By contrast, there was a highly significant and strong effect of species ( R 2 = 0.5048, p < 0.0001), with pairwise tests indicating cranial shape differences between 16 of the 45 pairwise comparisons ( table 2 ).

There are highly significant age differences across all comparisons: HC vs. pMS ( p < 0.0001), HC vs. fMS ( p < 0.0001), and pMS vs. fMS ( p < 0.0001).

The proportions of patients who responded favorably, by either parameter, i.e., absolute weight and BMI, were 86% and 34.6% for V7 and placebo respectively, which was highly significant by Fisher's 2 × 2 contingency table ( P < 0.0001).

The analysis contrasting groups within each subphase showed that the AO: PMDD+ group had a highly significant increase in food cravings relative to all three study groups in the LL subphase: the AL: PMDD− group ( t -ratio = 5.27; p ≤ 0.0001), the AL: PMDD+ group ( t -ratio = 4.78; p ≤ 0.0001), and the AO: PMDD− group ( t -ratio = 4.87; p ≤ 0.0001) ( Table 2 ).

Relationship between PHAS and PHA Patterns, and PHAS Pattern and Morphological Data The association between the PHAS and PHA patterns was highly significant and nearly complete (χ2 = 187.93; df = 20; p < 0.0001; Cramér’s V = 0.94).

Firstly, using geographic origin as a trait, a highly significant association was found ( AI = 8.8954, P < 0.0001; PS = 69.3392, P < 0.0001) ( Table 2 ).

Co-expression pattern analysis in normal cervical tissue revealed highly significant co-expressions ( P <0.0001) between TSP-2 and most other genes analysed (VEGF 121 , VEGF 165 , VEGF-C, b-FGF and MMP-2).

The statistical difference was also highly significant (Newman–Keuls; p < 0.0001) between samples from Group C and those from Group L while the difference between group S and the group L was not statistically significant ( Table 5 ).

(2022) found no significant differences in input resistance and spike width between Calb2 and Chrna2 cells, whereas we found highly significant differences in these parameters ( p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01, respectively, in pairwise comparisons), and also in the initial firing frequency and adaptation ratio (Extended Data Fig. 9-1 ).

A highly significant difference (p < 0001, by unpaired t -test) was observed between ThT fluorescence before and after fibril formation, and this difference was greater than 4 fold for both fibril types tested.

Results We observed a highly significant decrease in the presence of the KIR2DS2 and KIR2DS4 genes (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.05-0.41, P = 0.0001; OR = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.02-0.2, P = 0.000, respectively) and in the presence of the KIR2DL5A gene (OR = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.02-0.14, P = 0.0000) in the TC group compared to the HC group.