Analysis of cancer genome datasets (TCGA and GTEx) revealed greater NLRP3 and IL-1β expression in cutaneous melanoma samples ( n = 469) compared to normal skin ( n = 324), with a highly significant correlation between NLRP3 and IL-1β ( P < 0.0001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Pathway analysis revealed the following highly significant pathways (p < 0.0001): nervous system development, metabolism of proteins, and fragile X syndrome (FXS) ( Table 5 and Supplemental Table 9).
The analysis revealed a highly significant difference in symptom severity distribution (χ2 = 18.13, p = 0.0001, and degrees of freedom = 2).
A principal components analysis revealed differentiation between populations spawning at different times and in different geographical regions (electronic supplementary material, figure S2), and the first two principal components were highly significant using the Tracy-Widom statistic ( p < 0.0001).
Correlation analysis There were highly significant negative correlations between anxiety and depression scores and LAC ReHo values in the DON group ( r = -0.9336, P < 0.0001 and r = -0.8453, P < 0.0001, respectively; Figure 5 ).
This difference is highly significant (p < 0.0001; unpaired Student's t test).
The pairwise comparisons between concentrations in front of and behind the filter unit revealed highly significant differences for all microbiological parameters ( p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test).
However, considering SIRI, simple linear regression shows a highly significant statistical correlation of this index with age, with an increase in SIRI values according to age ( Figure 2 a; R 2 = 0.08; p -value <0.0001), although significant heterogeneity exists at extreme ages ( Figure S5 ).
In all cases, differences were highly significant ( p < 1 × 10 −4 ): A . bandense , p = 4.76 × 10 −7 ; D . pealeii , p = 2.38 × 10 −5 ; E . berryi , p = 1.37 × 10 −5 ; I . argentinus , p = 2.13 × 10 −6 ; I . illecebrosus , p = 2.77 × 10 −5 ; O . bimaculoides , p = 2.06 × 10 −8 ; S . officinalis , p = 1.06 × 10 −6 ; and A . bandense juvenile skin swabs, p = 4.77 × 10 −49 .
The average hyphal areas in the zep-A2 and zep-B1 mutants were approximately 50% of those in the WT, and these differences were highly significant (Student’s t -test, P < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 G).
The first cluster spanned the time window from 95 to 510 ms, peaking at 115 ms, with a highly significant cluster (p < 0.0001, peak Cohen’s d = 1.6927).
standard 5 mg versus reduced 2.5 mg twice daily) and differing proportions of dialysis-dependent versus non-dialysis advanced CKD patients across the included studies." Meta-regression confirmed that the specific DOAC agent was a highly significant moderator of bleeding risk (Q M = 22.88, p < 0.0001).
The difference in MDA levels between the healthy and erlotinib groups was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Instead, we found a highly significant correlation between the catalytic activity β1i and its expression level ( Figure 5B , r 2 = 0.86, p<0.0001, individual values are included in Table S1 ).
In addition, our results show that the S-pillar has a positive and highly significant (p-value < 0.01%) impact on ROA.
TotDis during the AC and NS periods (proxy for exploration) did not significantly vary between feed treatments (χ 2 = 0.46, df = 3, p = 0.93) (see Figure 7 ), but there was a highly significant effect of TL (χ 2 = 71.4, df = 1, p < 0.0001), i.e., the higher the TL, the lower the TotDis. 3.3.2.
After correcting for gene variation, the tissue effect was also highly significant (F 21,5669 = 4094.43, p<0.0001), reflecting that in general ribosomal proteins as a group were more highly expressed in certain tissues.
When comparing the medians (interquartile ranges) of the 2 GA-T trials performed by the participants, no significant difference was noted, although the time to complete the second trial was shorter [365 (260-545) s vs 360 (250-540) s, P=0.81]; highly significant intraobserver agreement (P<0.0001) was observed between the measurements of the 2 GA-T trials (ICC=0.97 and 95%CI: 0.96-0.99).
Comparison of gingival scores Result obtained from repeated measure of ANOVA showed a highly significant decrease (F=11.981; P <0.0001) in mean gingival score from baseline to 8 th week in all the groups.
There was a highly significant improvement in DHI and HIT-6 at pre- vs. postoperative ( p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively).
The main effects of both Relative Risk and Relative Negativity were highly significant (see Table 3 ), as were the simple effects for each language ( p < 0.0001 for the effects of both Relative Risk and Relative Negativity for both the native and foreign language).
Highly significant (P < 0.0001) differences among lines were observed for all traits except for ADF and ADL in the three years trials conducted at Varanasi.
Differences in TRBV usage was highly significant between cohorts showing 77% of total variation by two-way ANOVA ( p ≤ 0.0001) ( Figure 2 A).
In a sensitivity analysis excluding two studies that included patients with THPT [ 28 , 30 ], the pooled effect remained robust and highly significant (SMD = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.53 to 1.84; p < 0.0001), with negligible heterogeneity ( I 2 ≈ 0%).
However, at 39°C, the frequency of the S686G virus gradually decreased with passage number (48.6% in inoculum vs 29.1% at passage 3), the trend being highly significant (general linear model: P < 0.0001).