Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In a Kruskall-Wallis analysis of the normalized frequencies of the Foa races 4 and 2 hetero- and homo-CATs, there were highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001) between the strains; the non-parametric Steel-Dwass multiple comparison test found highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001) between all pairs, i.e., there were highly significantly fewer (apparently non-existent) hetero-CATs than either homo-CATs, and there were highly significantly more homo-CATs of Foa race 2 than homo-CATs of Foa race 4.
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Effect of Dapagliflozin in Comparison With Placebo on Manifestations of Worsening HF In a prespecified expanded, 4-component, composite outcome of time to first HF hospitalization, urgent HF visit, outpatient worsening event, or CV death (total number of events=1211), there was a highly significant benefit of dapagliflozin over placebo: hazard ratio (HR), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65–0.82), P <0.0001 (Figure 1 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The regression indicated, using the Nagelkerke pseudo-R 2 , that 22% of the variance in HCW abuse was accounted for by these two predictor variables, with externally assessed gender role being highly significant (p < 0.0001) and being exposed or identifying as an MSM to the HCW not significant as a predictor (p = 0.38).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This compares well with the finding of Bala et al ., in which seroprevalence of syphilis was reported to be 1.2%[ 11 ] while the overall seroprevalence of syphilis in a study from Maharashtra was found to be 0.7% (90/13,008).[ 12 ] In our study, we found that seroprevalence of syphilis by VDRL test among male patients was 5.02 (365/7278) while that in females was 0.74 (368/50,030), and the difference between the two was highly significant.( P < 0.0001) It is comparable to the report by Geusau et al .[ 13 ] Moreover, in a study conducted by Tankhiwale and Naikwade, the seroprevalence of syphilis in males and females was 1.73% (44 of 2537) and 0.4% (46 of 10414), respectively.[ 12 ] The higher seroprevalence of syphilis in males could be because of the fact that only the suspected patients or high-risk patients or patients attending STI clinic are usually tested for syphilis serology.