“highly significant”

Nevertheless, the density of Matrin3 tags around repressed compared to control exons was highly significant ( P < 0.0001, χ 2 test).

Two-way ANOVA (genotype × light) showed no significant main effect of genotype, F(1,23) = 0.67, p = 0.42, a highly significant main effect of light, F(1, 23) = 51.90, p < 0.0001, and no significant genotype × light interaction, F(1, 23) = 0.42, p = 0.52.

For all heat strain variables, the splines te(T a , p a ) modeling the influence of temperature and humidity were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Analysis of variance exhibited that effect of T2 (50 mM of KNO 3 ), T4 (150 mM of KNO 3 ) were highly significant ( P < 0.0001, and P < 0.001 respectively) on final seed germination (%) among all priming treatments.

The gene expressions were highly significant for the study group with the MOI of 1 × 10 6 compared to other MOIs (One-Way ANOVA test; * *** p < 0.0001).

The Gompertz curve fitted to the entire data set was highly significant ( F = 5127.5, P > 0.0001, df = 2, 107) and accounted for 99% of the total variation in the data ( Table 2 ).

Results Cathodal group Transcranial direct current stimulation produced a very highly significant effect in the cathodal group, as demonstrated by a significant main effect of stimulation condition ( p < 0.0001) (Table 1 ).

Over the entire data set, the difference between the QMEAN scores assigned to mesophilic and thermophilic proteins is highly significant ( P = 0.0001, see Table 3 ).

However, Group B demonstrated greater improvement than Group A, with highly significant results (p<0.0001).

From a morphometric analysis the number of TZPs in FSH antral follicles (mean number ± SD per 20 μm 2 = 6.80 ± 6.20) appeared reduced in comparison with that found in FCS follicles, and this difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) (Table 1 ).

All employed concentrations of ES induced a highly significant reduction in cell vitality in respect to CO, starting from 0.1% at 24 h ( F (5,30) = 2794.7, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1a ).

This model was highly significant (p<10 −4 ) and explained 7.5% of the variation in African ancestry levels between individuals (adjusted R 2 ).

A significant reduction (*** p = 0.0013) in total body weight after treatment with SEM was observed in the SL group and a highly significant reduction (**** p < 0.0001) was observed in the SM and SH groups.

In contrast, cells expressing E2814-CAR exhibited highly significant differences ( F (7, 16) = 127.2703, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.9824; Table 3b).

The difference in percentage of time pausing was highly significant (P< 0.0001, Mann-Whitney, P<0.00004, Kolmogorov-Smirnov).

The difference in representation of our potential targets of T cell recognition and the “pseudotargets” of randomly selected sets in peptides that really elicited T cell response was highly significant for both pentapeptides (39.9% versus 10.2%, P < 0.0001, Cohen’s d = 27.50) and hexapeptides (99.0% versus 73.7%, P < 0.0001, Cohen’s d = 16.2).

faecium ( n = 37) were gelatinase-positive and their correlation was highly significant (chi-square p = 0.0001, Fisher’s Exact test p = 0.0001) ( Table 6 ).

The differences between the older and middle aged worms combined and the young worms were highly significant (p<0.0001) but not that between the older and middle aged worms.

The difference across the five main classes (CRC, APL, non-advanced adenoma, non-neoplastic and no pathology) was significant ( P < 0.0001; Kruskal–Wallis) and remained highly significant comparing all classes excluding CRC (P < 0.0001; Kruskal–Wallis).

A statistical significance threshold of p<0.05 was established, marking the cut-off for inferring meaningful differences in the data (** p-value < 0.01 denotes strong statistical significance; *** p-value < 0.001 signifies highly significant statistical difference; **** p-value < 0.0001 demonstrates extremely significant statistical significance.).

5 E) levels in the tumor tissues of the PAC treatment group compared to the control group, with both lipid peroxidation and Fe 2+ levels exhibiting an increase of over 10 times that of the control group, indicating a highly significant statistical distinction between the two groups (p < 0.0001).

Results Statistical evaluation confirmed a highly significant association of all analyzed SNP's with the occurrence of MI (p < 0.0001; OR: 1.621-2.039).

We also evaluated whether the main effect of PiB was observed without the interaction term in the model, and found that precuneus PiB had a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) inverse relation to the canonical variate, as expected.

Results There was a highly significant Kendall rank order correlation between cataract scores for the two eyes (Kendall τ = 0.48, P <0.0001), this score was significantly repeatable ( R = 0.72 (SE = 0.02), F = 6.09, d.f. = 1077, 1144, r 2 = 0.85, P <0.0001), and, we used the mean score in subsequent analyses.

Comparing all of the nine different chemical blends, there were highly significant differences (P<0.0001).