Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In a multilevel model describing HbA1c as dependent variable, the predictor time was highly significant at all time points (p < 0.0001), using time as categorical variable (drop of HbA1c at: Visit 4 = -2.3308, Visit 3 = -2.3583, Visit 2 = -2.0816, Visit 1 = -1.2916) or as continuous variable (drop of HbA1c per time unit = -0.5964).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In animals subjected to the streptozotocin protocol (STZ-DPN), there was a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) reduction (95%) in PWT (>0.12 g i.e., static mechanical allodynia) which was restored to a level that was comparable to the saline-treated group (>2.5 g) by the dose of gabapentin (75 mg/kg) as the positive control standard drug ( Figures 1A–C ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When the association was analyzed using 500 kb genome windows, a highly significant and positive, but very weak, correlation was found; gene density explained only 3% of the variance in off-target site density ( Figure 2C ; r = 0.17, p < 0.0001). 3.2 Targeted sequencing depth To estimate the coverage depth obtained by the bait-capture targeted sequencing approach at off-target sites, we computed the depth of coverage at pre-filtered variant sites identified by Mutect2 ( Figure 3A ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant trend emerges from the data (Cochran–Armitage Trend Test = −4.72, p < 0.0001): as the absolute value of the Tmax/Dmax ratio increases, the physiological outcome decreases, from 52.4% in the first quartile, 33.3% in the second quartile, 14.3% in the third quartile to 0.0% in the last quartile, respectively.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Indeed, a comparison between the times of peaks and troughs of conidiation showed large differences between these phase markers in a Δ frq strain, and a detailed statistical analysis (paired t -test) for peaks and troughs of conidiation confirmed that these differences are, with one exception, highly significant (paired t -test, P < 0.0001; see Table S2 for t - and P -values for all phase markers, T cycles, and strains analyzed).