“highly significant”

This analysis confirmed highly significant effects of both treatment (χ 2 = 158.84, p < 0.0001) and time (χ 2 = 43.82, p < 0.0001) on germination.

The difference between NT-proBNP and galectin-3 being highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Degrees of significance were assessed by three different rating values: * p 0.05 (significant), ** p 0.01 (highly significant), *** p 0.001 (extremely significant), and **** p ≤ 0.0001 (extremely significant) or non-significant ( p 0.05). 5.

This increase was highly significant (p<0.0001).

A highly significant correlation between 24-h protein intake and 24-h urine urea excretion was found (t 50 = 15.7, p<0.0001) ( Figure S2 ).

Additionally, the Q-statistic was highly significant [Q(6) = 587.82, p < 0.0001], further confirming that the observed variation is unlikely to be due to chance alone.

Statistical analysis demonstrated a highly significant difference between the two groups ( p < 0.0001).

Post hoc pairwise comparisons following highly significant Kruskal-Wallis test ( p -value < 0.0001) revealed four major groups reflecting significantly different PC distribution patterns within the ML (Fig. 7c ): ordered monolayer (group I), ordered multilayer (II), scattered multilayer (III) and totally scattered (IV).

One-way ANOVA across environments indicated that genotypes (representing established DH populations and their parents), growing environments, and genotype–environment (G × E) interaction had a highly significant effect on SL ( P < 0.0001) ( Table 2 ).

This 1.65-fold gene enrichment is highly significant ( P < 10 − 4 ).

Genetic differentiation among the sub-clusters was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Furthermore, both IgG1 rK39 RDTs (n = 38) and ELISAs showed a highly significant difference in test outcomes between cured patients and those who relapsed (n = 23; P < .0001).

However, when the analysis looked at the telephone counselling intervention subgroup actually reached by telephone, in comparison to the 'no call' and control groups, there was a highly significant difference in favour of the intervention subgroup: 7.0 PP increase; p < 0.0001 [ 64 ].

6044.5, p = 0.0751) but became highly significant at 3–6 months (5004.5 vs. 6540.7, p < 0.0001) and ≥ 1 year (4916.1 vs. 6044.4, p = 0.0120).

A highly significant association between CEI and mortality was noted (p < 0.0001), with mortality reduction of 8.1 (CI: 6.6–9.6) per 1000 units CEI.

A highly significant increase in PP level in the plasma was detected in the rotenone-treated rats ( p < 0.0001) compared to the control group ( Figure 3 A).

The analysis of variance with the significant value of R 2 (0.97) indicated that the quadratic model utilized for this prediction was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The estimated EPSPS gene copy number ratios between ApR and ApS were highly significant (p < 0.0001) at 9.1 and 8.7 when normalised to the ALS and CPS genes, respectively ( Table 2 ).

The fit of the best model to the data was highly significant (Hosmer–Lemeshow χ 2 = 38.17, P < 0.0001).

These findings, supported by a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001), suggest that ProBC Plus had a substantial and beneficial impact on the immune modulation of the participants throughout the study period.

The TPC model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), confirming that the selected factors substantially influence extraction yield.

Particularly stomach (SUVmean and max), jejunum (SUVmean), ileum (SUVmean and max), ascending colon (SUVmax) and sigmoid colon (SUVmean and max) showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).

A linear regression model fitted with HbA1c reduction as the outcome and baseline HbA1C as the predictor demonstrated a highly significant relationship R 2 =0.74; p<0.0001 ( figure 4 and online supplemental file 6 ).

For all three emotions, the effect was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Furthermore, functional diversity FDis had a highly significant and positive effect on food suitability (lm, p < 0.0001, ad. r 2 = 0.53) of sampled prey communities ( Fig. 4B ).