However, the columellar length × niche interaction is highly significant ( F 2,121 = 15.26, p < 0.0001), indicating that the allometric slope varies among ecological groups.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
A r -value of 0.97 shows very strong correlation between CFB and GCB, which was statistically highly significant ( P <0.0001).
The positive correlation in RSCU between HTLV-1 and human genes is highly significant (Pearson r = 0.4982, P < 0.0001, Spearman r = 0.4688, P = 0.0002).
Values of area under the ROC calculated from all 381 samples for all mutations displayed highly significant values when compared with all mutations (p=0.0001; binomial exact test) suggesting that any mutation signature is able, to partially discriminate other types of mutations (supplementary table S4).
The mean CO efficiency in the mph1Δ strain was thus 0.20, a change that was highly significant when compared to WT (p<0.0001).
10.02 ± 6.35) showed highly significant variations ( p < 0.0001).
The 19/24 published experiments with moderate, strong, or total loss of binding all showed highly significant ( P < 10 −4 ) negative contrast differences.
These IHC results are in agreement with what was observed by Western blot (Figure 5 B), and statistical data analysis indicated the existence of a highly significant correlation between MBP-1 and HDAC1 expression in tumors (p<0.0001), with a Spearman rank correlation coefficient equal to 0.714 (Figure 6 A).
The effect of rTHImax on daily milk yield was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
3.6 Relationship between SPT wheal size and sensitization There was a highly significant and strong positive correlation (r s = 0.90; p < 0.0001) between the average SPT wheal size of all pollen species and the number of pollen species with a positive SPT result.
Combining the pollinator catches for each sampling week showed a highly significant difference (F 6, 890 = 29.4, p < 0.0001) among the sampling weeks, with a steady increase from the first sampling week (25.25 ± 3.79) through the fifth week, with the highest peak occurring on week six (154.75 ± 19.90) ( Figure 3 ).
The rectification index for cells from normal eyes was 0.97 ± 0.04 ( n = 14) compared to 0.52 ± 0.03 in retinas from HT eyes ( n = 13), a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).
Both of the main effects, sample and clone, are highly significant (both P < 0.0001).
This difference in maximum lodscores was highly significant (p < 0.0001), implying that the effect of this chromosome may vary with age.
This revealed a highly significant interaction [ F (4,240) = 26.42, P < .0001], indicating that the lateralization of shared processing depends on frequency band ( Fig. 2 ).
A marked and significant increase in cell viability was observed at 100 and 250 μg mL −1 (117.4% and 114%), showing a highly significant enhancement compared with control ( p < 0.0001) and ( p < 0.001) respectively.
Motility, biofilm formation, morphotype and Vi-antigen assay At the two time-points (six hours and 12 h of incubation), the difference in swarming motility was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
Plate counting assays revealed a significant reduction in bacterial viability in the 3D-NEBS group relative to all control groups (Control, GelMA and 3D-BS), with highly significant differences (**** P < 0.0001; Figure 5B and C ).
The highly significant p-values (p-value < 0.0001) for the likelihood ratio, score, and Wald tests indicate that the model as a whole fits significantly better than an intercept-only model, confirming that the inclusion of explanatory variables provides a meaningful contribution to predicting adherence levels ( Table 2 ).
Statistical analysis using the Student’s t -test for related samples showed a highly significant difference between pre- and post-test scores ( p < 0.0001), indicating a strong effect of the intervention on stress reduction.
Pairwise comparisons showed highly significant differences (p<0.0001) between protected and unprotected lands, as well as between partially protected and unprotected lands.
Dynamics of Post-Ingestive Sensations A highly significant effect of time ( p ≤ 0.0001) was seen for all post-ingestive sensation variables across test meals: Energized (F = 18.45, p < 0.0001), Relaxation (F = 5.38, p < 0.0001), Concentration (F = 13.89, p < 0.0001), Sleepiness (F = 7.42, p < 0.0001), Fullness (F = 88.78, p < 0.0001), Hunger (F = 64.22, p
The effect of Fe fortification on the Fe concentration of cooked split desi seed (soup) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The developed models were highly significant at probability level of P = 0.0001 and multiple correlation co-efficient (R 2 ) was 0.9563 for cellulase, 0.9532 for xylanase and 0.9780 for ligninase.
The full set of environmental variables explains 28.3% of the variation in the species abundances, which is highly significant at P <0.0001 according to a permutation test [40] .