“highly significant”

Logistic regression analysis showed a highly significant effect of PPF resistance on mosquito susceptibility to ZIKV infection (χ 2 = 41.50, df = 5, p < 0.0001).

Within-group analysis using paired t-tests demonstrated a highly significant reduction in SPADI scores from baseline at all follow-up intervals in both groups (p < 0.0001).

The TMAO concentrations showed a highly significant difference between patients with CKD and healthy controls ( p < 0.0001).

On the first day after PCI, highly significant associations were found of ASAT with IL-6 and neutrophil count (both: r>0.75, p<0.0001), and of CgA with neutrophil count and monocyte count (both: r>0.79, p<0.0001); furthermore, cortisol was also associated with neutrophil count (r>0.7, p<0.0001).

In lung adenocarcinoma, the most predictive signature generated from the Kim and colleagues ( 38 ) dataset revealed no association with survival when derived from ldvae [ P = 0.25 or −log 10 ( P ) = 0.6], whereas the BBKNN signature showed a highly significant predictive capacity [ P = 1e−4 or −log 10 ( P ) = 4; Fig. 5B ].

The difference in MIC between the two agents against the standard isolate was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), whereas the difference in MBC was not statistically significant ( p = 0.1030).

Variance between the two years was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), contributing 39.4% to the total phenotypic variance of As accumulation ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

AIA score, on the experiment termination day (day 21), showed highly significant improvement ( p < 0.0001) in TXR200 followed by DS ( p = 0.0006) and TXR100 and TXR50 groups (both p = 0.002). 3.2.3 Reduction in Footpad Thickness Upon TXR Treatment Significant reduction of mean footpad thickness in TXR-treated groups was observed in a dose-dependent manner ( Figure 3B ).

Both AI-based and human-based evaluations demonstrated highly significant reductions in root length between pre- and post-treatment measurements ( p < 0.0001).

In contrast, the coefficient of skewness (γ skew ) is negative and highly significant (−0.0021, t = −4.0245, p = 0.0001).

Significance levels were denoted as follows: * p < 0.05 (significant); ** p < 0.01 (very significant); *** p < 0.001 (highly significant); **** p < 0.0001 (extremely significant); and ns, p > 0.05 (not significant). 3.

Comparisons with neurons in the same preparations expressing mCit:GKAP but not PSD-95:mTurq2:mAID revealed that the increase in mCit:GKAP fluorescence was highly significant ( p = 1.0*10 −4 ; 12 and 6 neurons, respectively).

Effect of temperature on the uptake of Rh-LNVs unearthed the involvement of energy-dependent endocytic pathway for the entrance of LNVs into the airway epithelial cells, as a highly significant reduction of 6 to 7-folds ( p < 0.0001) was noticeable vis-à-vis the control cells.

Also association of stigma with quality of life showed highly significant findings in both genders (p< 0.0001) on all the domains of DLQI.

2e ; Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, p ≤ 0.0021, N = 10) with a highly significant trend of reducing IOP over the 12-month period (Fig. 2f , simple linear regression, p < 0.0001).

Residuals of tick observations were likewise highly significant [estimate = 0.8 ± 0.04 (SE), z ‐value = 18.7, p < 0.0001], further highlighting that tick observations contain unique variation beyond seasonality influencing disease case numbers.

Correlation analysis suggested these results to be highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Correlations between mean LrS and mean YrS were r = 0.58 in population CA and r = 0.65 in CF. ANOVA for stripe rust and leaf rust severity resulted in highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001) for experiment, genotype and genotype × experiment interaction (Online Resource 4).

Other metabolic changes included a highly significant increase in free MyI, easily measured from its signal at 4.05 ppm: 2.61 ± 0.28 vs. 1 ± 0.55, p < 0.0001, n = 7 vs. n = 5, SUM1315-BRCA1 vs.

Longitudinal tumor growth data, analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with restricted maximum likelihood, revealed highly significant effects for both the time × group interaction [ p < 0.0001, F(5.514, 32.81) = 11.36] and the group main effect [ p < 0.0001, F(5, 119) = 41.56] ( Figure 2e ).

When comparing MD incidence between the birds challenged by Ikaros WT and Ikaros Mut, there were highly significant differences in MD incidence for both replicates 1 and 2 depending on infection with the different Ikaros alleles ( p < 0.0001 for both replicates).

A two-tailed unpaired t -test confirmed this difference was highly significant ( t = 73.07, P < 0.0001).

The TPC model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), confirming that the selected factors substantially influence extraction yield.

The interaction between year of diagnosis and health system (VHA vs NCDB) was highly significant ( P < .0001), confirming that survival trends over time differed between the two populations.

Correlation of intermediate and extensive TILs groups -combined- also showed a highly significant positive correlation with survival (p < 0.0001).