“highly significant”

Nominal logistic regression indicates that the line, age, and line-by-age interaction effects are all highly significant ( p <0.0001, Figure 1C ), but six lines show an opposite trend, ie. reduced failure rate with age.

Control), whereas apoVs drove a highly significant miRNA influx (e.g., let-7b-5p, p < 0.0001 vs.

Coumarin was the most notable for its highly significant interaction ( P < 0.0001), alongside a significant cultivar main effect ( P = 0.022) and a non-significant altitude main effect ( P = 0.103).

Mean ODI score improved from 82.32% preoperatively to 19.17% at final follow-up, a highly significant improvement ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 6 ).

However there was a highly significant difference between both groups regarding mean ± SD of CSAd, CSAp, ∆ CSA, and mean CSApd ( p = 0.0001) (Table 1 ).

Overall there was a highly significant difference between the two groups of donors as determined by two‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 ).

When comparing both right and left eye datasets, the column factor (indicating differences between corresponding LA3 versus RoB records) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and the average difference between predicted means was 2.91 ± 0.46 μV for right eyes and 3.0 ± 0.68 μV for left eyes, while the ratio between the predicted means was 1.71 for right eyes and 1.67 for left eyes.

As t appl , P mean and Z gen were used to calculate the values of E total , I mean and Q total , these variables showed highly significant multicollinearity (R 2 > 0.99, VIF > 200, p < 0.0001).

This was validated by ARS quantification, revealing a highly significant 6-fold increase in ARS concentration in the LT-Ti group compared to the SLA-Ti group (****, p < 0.0001; Figure 6 B).

The differences in frequencies were highly significant (P<0.0001).

The quadratic model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with R 2 Adj = 0.9875 and R 2 Pre = 0.9433 (a difference less than 0.2), indicating excellent fit and predictability.

Over the full kinetic curves these differences are maintained, with differences in the P3CSK-stimulated neutrophils between low MOI Spn compared to high MOI Spn remaining highly significant ( p ≤ 0.0001; Figure 6 D).

Using a mixed model to allow for correlation of the data, we found a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001) between weak and strong tapping ( Figure 1d ).

Each term in the model (coverage, month, and region) was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and provided significant explanatory power [ 16 ].

ANOVA The one-way ANOVA in supplementary Table 8 revealed a highly significant effect of solvent composition on Arsenic recovery (F(3, 8) = 268.3, p < 0.0001).

The difference in survival between the two groups was highly significant (HR: 7.8, 95% CI: 4.0–15.2; p<0.0001) ( Fig. 2 ).

According to Salimetrics’ assay protocol 1 “the correlation between saliva and serum was highly significant, r (47) = 0.91, p < 0.0001” (p. 16), indicating that “salivary cortisol levels reliably estimate serum cortisol levels” (p. 3).

Copulsatility of the GH and GHRH hormone series was highly significant in both patients ( P < 0.0001).

The statistical analyses revealed that there were highly significant differences in spine density among the groups in the proximal ( F (4, 266) = 9.635, p = 0.0001), medial ( F (4, 266) = 26.978, p = 0.0001), and distal ( F (4, 266) = 20.245, p = 0.0001) segments.

There was a highly significant negative correlation between the changes in PINP and BMD in lumbar spine and femoral neck from baseline to 12 months in all patients (r(s) = -0.68, P < 0.0001, and -0.45, P < 0.0001, respectively), and in pre- and post-menopausal patients separately.

A comparison of grain length in samples carrying GS3 -Hap1 or GS3 -Hap3 was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The stratum × crop interaction was highly significant (χ2 = 32.44, p < 0.0001), indicating that vertical distribution patterns depend on the host crop, while no interactions involving technique were significant.

In addition, GRA35 DNA/mRNA prime–boost regimens resulted in a highly significant reduction in brain cyst numbers ( p < 0.0001) compared with the control group.

Notably, Group 1 was enriched for low/medium–low purity, whereas Group 2 was predominantly composed of medium–high/high purity samples, showing a highly significant difference between groups ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 1 ).

Incorporating BTE-RAG substantially increased accuracy to 75.8%, corresponding to an absolute improvement of 24.8 percentage points, which was highly significant by paired analysis (McNemar P < 0.0001; Supplementary Table S3 ).