“highly significant”

We examined the socio-demographic elements that affect people’s awareness of the osteoporosis condition, and we found that there is a highly significant correlation between work environment and osteoporosis knowledge (p-value = 0.0001).

Tukey's multiple comparison test revealed highly significant differences in antimony susceptibility between Leishmania species (p value <0.0001).

Expressing the survival as CFU/ml instead of as percentages however reveals a highly significant difference between the strains in the actual number of surviving bacteria at 2, 9, and 21 h post-penicillin addition ( P < 0.0001), which again can be explained as a significant strain dependent difference in invasiveness (Figure 5 ).

The Bartlett's test on the control distribution showed that this variability was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, χ 2 = 409.19452).

However, the difference between both normal melanocytes and skin, as well as between tumor samples and skin, was not only highly significant (adjusted p -values < 0.0001) but also substantially larger in magnitude, as shown in Fig. 2 E.

Results: In the present study, total 110 study subjects responded by completely filling out the questionnaire The total calorie and protein intake of the study subjects before and after giving intervention for three months was found to be highly significant (p-value < 0.0001).

Moreover, we observed a highly significant increase in shedded FIBCD1 in samples collected from TG littermates during the acute phase (day 10) of the initial inflammation induced by DSS treatment (p<0.0001). 4 Discussion In the present study, we sought to examine the role of intestinal FIBCD1 in CRC.

The difference between the two PD severity cohorts was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that APS is a more sensitive method than RRS or BWS ( p = 0.1896 and 0.0020, respectively; Fig. 1l ).

Model 2 Results Model 2 is given by: 4 q it = - 9.7530 2.5982 + 0.0072 0.0003 t + 0.9197 0.0015 q i t - 1 + 0.0501 0.0024 W i t - 1 + 0.0267 0.0041 e Lat i + 38.2003 10.6452 e Long i - 1.1578 0.2894 L a t i + 2.9320 1.0856 Long i + 2.9204 0.6886 ln Lat i + 15.8138 4.8442 ln - Long i + 0.1297 0.0259 L a t i · Long i + 0.0614 0.0278 d p t + 0.0337 0.0248 d p t - 1 + 0.0616 0.0261 d p t - 3 + 0.0043 0.0003 F I i - 4 The coefficient on the deterministic trend, 0.0072, was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), though somewhat smaller than that on initial month of production in Eq. 1 .

A highly significant positive correlation ( ρ = 0.95, P < 0.0001) between expression levels and the normalized difference between ω mus and ω cas ( δ ω ) provides confirmatory support for our results ( fig. 3 B ).

The results suggest that the change of microwave power and extraction time had highly significant effects on the yield of silymarin ( P < 0.0001) from S. marianum straws.

Overlapping transcripts between MCDD mice and HCC did show a weak and highly significant agreement in direction of transcriptional change (R 2 0.085, P < 0.0001, Figure 6I ).

2 , highly significant correlations ( P < 0.0001 for all markers) were observed for ER (tumor R = 0.76), Ki‐67 (tumor R = 0.41), CD4 (tumor R = 0.34, stroma R = 0.52), and CD8 (tumor R = 0.48, stroma R = 0.56).

To determine whether age at spontaneous puberty and age at the start of GH in patients with TS are associated, we performed a correlation analysis, revealing a highly significant correlation between age at the start of GH treatment and age at pubertal onset [correlation coefficient 0.65 ( p -value < 0.0001)], which explained 32% of the variability in spontaneous puberty with age at GH start [intercept = 10.3 years ( p < 0.0001), slope = 0.31 ( p < 0.0001)].

Whereas correlations of PPAS-6 and PPAS-3 scores with job control at the within-subgroup level (r within ) were highly significant (p < .0001) according to both the R statistic and t-test, such correlations at the between-subgroup level (r between ) were not significant (p>.05). “ S2 Table ” in the supplement/appendix outlines the key indices of within-subgroup variability and interrater agreement in PPAS-6 and PPAS-3 scores among the same validation population subgroups used to assess factor invariance.

To check this we performed real-time RT-PCR on patient lymphoblastoid RNA and observed a highly significant drop of >75% in CARMIL2 expression levels for the F1 proband versus healthy controls ( p < 0.0001).

The correlation between MMP-8 and sTREM-1 by the Spearman rank test was highly significant ( r = 0.8640, p < 0.0001; Figure 4 C).

For all heat strain variables, the splines te(T a , p a ) modeling the influence of temperature and humidity were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

In slices from animals exposed to kynurenine and probenecid, galantamine increased the plateau LTP even further, with ANOVA indicating a highly significant increase compared with controls ( F (9,70) = 57.8, P < 0.0001) and with all individual points significantly different at P < 0.0001.

In a model including both eyes, the effect of relative clause type does not reach significance ( β = 0.071, z = 1.46, p = 0.14), but we again find a highly significant interaction of RC type and item order ( β = −0.062, z = −4.07, p < 0.0001).

This is a highly significant difference from a calculated expected value based on an even distribution of correlation values ( p < 0.0001, Chi-squared on proportions for both WT at day 7 and IL-17KO at day 14).

Finally, the interaction term (i.e., Extraversion × ISI category) was highly significant ( R 2 Change = 0.009, p < 0.0001), suggesting that the association between extraversion and suicidal ideation differed between those with high and low levels of insomnia, as predicted, even after controlling for depression and loneliness.

Statistical difference between the two survival curves was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

According to the results of the variation analysis, it was determined that magnetic field intensity interaction was very highly significant ( p < 0.0001) on the DPPH value and the pellicle weight.

Both groups appeared to show a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) improvement in demeanor and exercise tolerance at day 35, yet the difference between groups was not significant.