“highly significant”

In non-spatial linear models lichen cover showed highly significant differences by distance classes (F = 7.7, p<0.0001).

The final model was highly significant (p value <0.0001).

The difference between the chromatic contrast sensitivity measured during fixation and saccades was highly significant (Mann-Whitney z = 7.96, p < 0.0001).

Kaplan–Meier ‘survival analysis’ applied to freedom-from-tumors, followed by a stratified log-rank test for equality of survivor function showed a highly significant difference between the Keap1 flox/flox /Nrf2 +/+ and Keap1 flox/flox /Nrf2 −/− groups (χ 2 = 14.5; p < 0.0001).

Time to reach the discharge criteria (home readiness) was early in Group P than Group S, and this difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) [ Table 2 ].

pombe spores irradiated at the same level; the differences being highly significant (p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 1B ).

There was a highly significant media*volatile interaction ( p < 0.0001) for the raw responses reflective of compounds that not only differ in media solubility but also differences in response factors arising from electron impact mass spectrometry.

A well-known correlation between Fusarium toxins DON and ZEN was weak and highly significant (r = 0.28, p < 0.0001).

This finding was also clear for simulations on the directed AMBCA-based network when compared with the random directed network ( Figure 4B ), with a larger difference in predictive power (random − directed = −0.086), which was highly significant for unpaired ( p < 0.0001) and paired ( p < 0.0001) t testing.

This regression was highly significant (standardized beta=0.49±0.002, t=35.25, P <0.0001, R 2 =0.34; linear regression).

Statistical testing with the Mann Whitney U test revealed that the differences in antibody levels between the HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected participants were all highly significant (P<0.0001).

Although, there was a highly significant positive correlation between the two variables in all four stages, the correlation was not strong ( r = 0.24 ± 0.03, p < 0.0001).

The HI and SRH titres had an r value of 0·809 in the Spearman’s rank test and correlated with a highly significant P value ( P < 0·0001) after the second immunisation ( Figure 7 ).

For SCO the total number of patches (average of 24.6 patches +/- 0.770) was found to be highly significant increased (p < 0.0001) compared to NSP (17.7 +/- 0.465), ( Fig 4A ).

The Pearson’s correlation coefficient between these two maps was modest but highly significant (r=0.24, p<0.0001 for both smoothed and unsmoothed permuted data; confirmed through a permutation test shuffling voxel location across 100,000 iterations; Figure 2C ).

Second, all the model statistics were highly significant ( p < .0001), excepted for the inferior lateral ventricle model for AD which was only significant ( p < .05). 3.3 Classification based on multiple lifespan models To evaluate the classification performance of HAVAs on testing datasets, we performed a comparison with the three most discriminant structures.

However, the combination of drought and deforestation dried out almost all transplanted bromeliads (WV = 0 mL in each bromeliad, except for one plant subjected to simultaneous disturbances), so there was highly significant difference in pairwise comparisons testing combined disturbances vs control or vs drought alone in the forest ( p < 0.0001 for all).

Results Highly significant ( p = 0.0001) increase in cycle threshold qPCR and decrease in the mean concentration of EBV DNA (p = 0.0001) were observed in serum samples, but no significant changes were observed in saliva.

The model’s intercept had an estimate of 93.53 with a standard error of 0.48, yielding a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001).

The PERMANOVA showed a highly significant difference between the three populations ( F = 8.79, DF = 2, P = 0.0001) as well as for each pair of populations ( S2 Table ).

The CLEC treatment provided an accelerated wound closure that was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) over time compared to the other two treatment arms.

In this CDA, all MANOVA tests yielded highly significant results ( p < 0.0001), indicating the robustness of the group separation.

The reduction in mean plaque scores was also highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Conversely, the differences between the SCAT and both the VAT and PVAT were highly significant when the CD16+36 high CD163− subpopulation that corresponded to pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages was analyzed (both p < 0.0001).

Also association of stigma with quality of life showed highly significant findings in both genders (p< 0.0001) on all the domains of DLQI.