“highly significant”

Additionally, the model reached a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001), and the lack of fit of this model is insignificant ( p > 0.05).

Taken together, the BoAstV CH13/NeuroS1 infection that we detected by ISH and IHC in approximately 1/3 of cattle diagnosed with non-suppurative encephalitis, while negative controls remained unstained, clearly shows a correlation with the disease, which is supported by an extremely highly significant statistical correlation (two-tailed p < 0.0001). 3.2.

7 a, 8 a), each a greater overshoot than their respective control group: this difference was highly significant for IW ( t score = 9.51, p < 0.0001), but not for KS ( t score = 0.53, p = 0.26).

Further, due to the low computational requirements for polynomial regression, we were able to test this model against chance level by permutation inference, which suggested that the prediction was highly significant above chance (p < 0.0001). 3.2.

Statistical comparison confirmed that differences between regions were highly significant (χ 2 = 348.0, p < 0.0001), highlighting pronounced regional heterogeneity of the epizootiological situation ( Table 2 ).

Besides, the other variants showed highly significant differences of the HDL-C with different genotypes in both sexes (all p- values < 0.0001).

The genotype×time interaction (GEN.T) was highly significant in both experiments for SCC (GEN.T: TPE I, P <0.0001 and TPE II, P =0.0088) and for RF (GEN.T: TPE I, P <0.0001 and TPE II, P <0.0001).

The main effects of stimulus intensity, recording site, and their interactions were all highly significant, F4,152 = 96.29, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.82; F2,76 = 68.75, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.73; and F8,304 = 5.06, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.72.

Again using FP C max as an example metric, the estimated between‐batch variance (0.0598) was 1.7‐fold larger than the estimated residual variance (0.0353) and was a highly significant contributor to total variability ( P < 0.0001).

BST-CarGel® and microfracture groups showed highly significant improvement at 5 years from pretreatment baseline for each WOMAC subscale ( P < 0.0001), and there were no differences between the treatment groups.

In multivariate analysis, the model was highly significant for OS ( p < 0.0001), and T stage ( p = 0.002) and ECOG performance status ( p < 0.001) arose as independent predictors, while BED 10 ≥ 132 Gy was associated with better LPFS ( p < 0.0001).

4 (G to I) , there was a highly significant difference in exosomal Aβ 1–42 levels between 5×FAD mice and C57BL/6 controls by iMEP ( P < 0.0001, unpaired t test).

But given the number of phonemes presented to the participants, our results are highly significant: all p < 10−4.

In particular, the difference between infected animals that received JWH-133 or not was highly significant for endpoints (p < 0.0001) and branch length (p < 0.001).

Each of the five subspecies showed highly significant population genetic differentiation ( p < 0.0001) by pairwise F st and R st with 10,000 permutations ( Table 5 ).

We found a highly significant correlation (P < 0.0001) between low or absent IPO11 and low or absent PTEN protein levels ( Fig. 7 A ).

All MWD service discharge categories Chi square analysis revealed a highly significant difference in proportions by service discharge category ( p < 0.0001).

Using GREAT, we found that about 77% of the genes associated with active TFAP2A peaks are also associated with active MITF peaks, a highly significant overlap (hypergeometric test, p<0.0001) ( Fig 3D ).

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) The ICC values were highly significant (p < 0.0001) for all the measurements, thus rejecting the null hypothesis (Table 3 ).

We found that NM localization of Hpa2 occurred primarily in metastatic PTC; none of the benign lesions (follicular adenoma and goiter) exhibited NM staining, compared to 7% of PTC and 21% of metastatic PTC, differences that were statistically highly significant (p<0.0001; Figure 2B and Table 1 ).

Every comparison reported highly significant differences: absolute initial angles for clockwise trials were smaller in the negative ( t 17 = -4.72, P < 10 −4 ) and positive contexts ( t 17 = -3.6, P = 0.001); for counter-clockwise perturbations the initial angles were also smaller in the negative ( t 17 = 4.03, P < 10 −4 ) and positive contexts ( t 17 = -3.61, P = 0.001, one-sided paired t-tests).

A Wilcoxon test showed a highly significant decrease of CMT from baseline (473 ± 196 μm) to month 1–3 (371 ± 163) ( p < 0.0001).

These differences were highly significant ( P < 0.0001, Figure 2C ).

Although storage duration alone had no significant main effect, the effect of time was highly significant at both time points ( P < .0001), reflecting distinct recovery and clearance profiles over time ( Figure 5 E-F; supplemental Table 3 ).

There were highly significant correlations ( r = 0.89, p < 10 –4 in Paris) and good intraclass correlation coefficients ( R = 0.89 in Paris) between the two series of values.