“highly significant”

In particular, the variable methanol % exhibited a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) influence on TPC yield.

Both tools showed highly significant change during the study (p<0.0001 for each), but agreement between the change in the two tools was only fair (κ=0.31).

The infiltration density of CD8+ T cells exhibits a highly significant positive correlation with microenvironmental PD-L1 expression (P < 0.0001).

Between group comparisons revealed a highly significant difference in antibody concentrations for male rats compared to female rats at weeks 8 ( p < 0.0001) and 10 ( p < 0.01).

This reduction of the ADT with time was highly significant for both species (Table 3 ; P < 0.0001).

young mice Semiquantitative analysis of the burden of clustered immunoreactive puncta in the hippocampal formation of all 40 mice (i.e., 22 young and 18 aged mice) revealed a highly significant linear trend toward greater load in aged mice ( p < 0.0001 for each of LC3, p62, ubiquitin, MAP2, and synapsin IIa stainings; χ 2 test for linear trend [Fig. 3a–e ]).

The overall effect of the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that NH 4 + , K + , NO 3 − , BAP, and NAA significantly affected growth.

Finally, the atorvastatin and liraglutide combination treatment group had the lowest body weight increase (and therefore the greatest reduction in weight gain) from 155 ± 5.1 g to only 224 g, when compared to both the HFD and the HFD/atorvastatin groups; this reduction was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 3.2.

MUAC was the variable with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, 0.76 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.83), and was highly significant (p<0.0001).

Of those, 11 were highly significant ( p < 10 −4 ) with log2-fold-changes between 1 and 19.

During the initial 6 months of the study, the cyclosporine A group had consistently lower IOP than the betamethasone group, which was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) detected highly significant differences among RILs for all traits in each environment ( p < 0.0001, Appendix C ), which indicates that genetic factors explain a large fraction of the observed phenotypic variability.

Results AMH and OSI show a highly significant negative correlation (r = -0.67; p = 0.0001) that is stronger than the one between AMH and the total number of retrieved oocytes and than the one between AMH and the total FSH dose.

control highly significant (e.g. in whole length, 32.0 vs . 59.9 mm; p < 0.0001), but were also significant between the two inoculation sets (N1 vs .

A two-way ANOVA detected a highly significant effect of light on E PAR (F1,74= 132.20, p < 0.0001) and a significant species vs. light interaction (F3,74 = 9.71, p < 0.0001), while for the main effect of species no significant differences were detected ( p = 0.627).

A highly significant correlation (r = 0.475, p <0.0001) was also found between the Ct values of the concordant positive saliva and NPS specimens.

For human genes, highly significant differences were found between G1 and G2 (F = 1.29; p <0.0001), G1 and G3 (F = 1.33; p <0.0001), or G1 and G4 exons (F = 1.33; p <0.0001), while none was found between G2 and G3 (F = 1.04; p = 0.4254), G2 and G4 (F = 1.03; p = 0.4285), or G3 and G4 exons (F = 1.00; p = 0.9243).

However, the combination of drought and deforestation dried out almost all transplanted bromeliads (WV = 0 mL in each bromeliad, except for one plant subjected to simultaneous disturbances), so there was highly significant difference in pairwise comparisons testing combined disturbances vs control or vs drought alone in the forest ( p < 0.0001 for all).

Decoding of uncued orientations was highly significant on both Switch (1–1.4 s after cue onset, corrected p = 0.0001) and Repeat trials (1.05–1.4 s, p = 0.0028, Switch > Repeat 1.25–1.4 s, p = 0.0295; Fig. 5 A , left panel inset).

The t-test revealed that no significant differences in HI were observed within lines in NIL15-YXZ or NIL15-SBSM ( p > 0.05), but highly significant difference in mean HI was observed between NIL15-YXZ and NIL15-SBSM ( p < 0.0001).

Furthermore, the clinical score differences on day four revealed highly significant intergroup variations, with P-values of <0.0001 for LPS + DH-HQ vs LPS, 0.0005 for LPS + DH-HQ vs LPS + DH, and 0.0028 for LPS + DH-HQ vs LPS + HQ (P < 0.005) ( Figure 14A ).

The mean serum CA-125 level was markedly elevated in the endometriosis group (51.9 ± 9.5 U/mL) compared to controls (16.0 ± 8.0 U/mL), showing a highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001).

Results Axial length Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant interaction between the type of defocus and time of measurement for axial length measures across the six defocus conditions (F (20,300) = 4.60, p < 0.0001).

Interactions between late referral and time on dialysis, and dialysis modality and time on dialysis were tested and found to be highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Concerning our pain measurement using the VAS, we could detect a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) comparing two years vs. preoperative and six months vs. preoperative results, which are illustrated in Figure 2 .