Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp value = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
In this study, a highly significant moderate correlation (R = 0.547 and p value = 0.000) is observed between telomere length and smoking habits, and a non-significant negligible correlation (Pearson’s coefficient = −0.05, p value = 0.576) with regular medication of diabetic individuals.
highly significantp -value = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
When it came to opinions regarding dental college as a source of information about child abuse, there was a highly significant difference between second-year students (six; 14.0%) and fifth-year students (thirty-one; 96.9%) with a ( p -value = 0.000), but no statistical significance between males (twenty; 52.6%) and females (seventeen; 45.9%) ( p -value = 0.563).
Child Abuse and Neglect: Awareness among Dental Students.
Healthcare (Basel) · 2023 · PMC10531096
highly significantp=0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
Association Between Fasting C-Peptide Levels and Severity Scores of Femoropopliteal Arteriosclerosis ( Table 3 ) According to the Fontaine score, there was a highly significant increase in fasting C-peptide levels in patients with a IIB score compared to those with an IIA score (p=0.000).
highly significantp = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
We found that EGFR was directly related to tumor differentiation, such that its expression increased with increasing grade of the tumor, and this was found to be statistically highly significant among the three grades (p = 0.000) of OSCCs.
highly significantp = 0.0000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
The association between graft loss due to PAT and grade of thrombosis proved highly significant (17/25 graft losses occurred in patients with grade 3 thrombosis vs . 7/25 with grade 2 thrombosis in the first 30 post-operative days, p = 0.0000 with the chi-square test).
highly significantP<0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
Very highly significant (P<0.000) The sample size was calculated according to a pre-established formula: N = population size e = Margin of error (percentage in decimal form) Z = Z-score (desired confidence level, 95%: z score = 1.96) The estimated sample size required to achieve a precision of ±0.05% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was 450 females.
highly significantp = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
modestly significantp = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
The moderation analysis showed that PDs with a non-traditional format have a highly significant effect on self-efficacy ( g = 0.820, p = 0.000) and PDs with a traditional format have a modestly significant effect on self-efficacy ( g = 0.462, p = 0.000).