“highly significant”

On the subsection relating to perceptions of health, two questions displaying significance ( P < 0.05; P < 0.01) and one highly significant ( P < 0.001), respectively, were as follows: “I am somewhat ill”; “I am as healthy as anybody I know”; and “I have been feeling bad lately”.

Similarly, A versus D showed a highly significant difference under both methods, t ( df ) = 8.30, p < .001.

Dizziness Handicap Inventory The DHI data revealed that there was a highly significant improvement pre- versus postoperatively (repeated measures ANOVA, F (1,11) = 254.6, p < 0.001) overall and for each group (Fig. 2 ), but no significant difference between patient groups (repeated measures ANOVA, F (2,11) = 1.8, p > 0.2).

Further, highly significant decrease was noted with administration of high-dose artesunate ( P < .001) in GSH, G-Px, and G-Rx after 45 days of treatment.

At baseline, the mean MASI score in the chemical peel group was 22.85 ± 4.35, which was substantially higher compared with the microneedling group (9.18 ± 4.10), and the between-group difference was highly significant (p < 0.001).

This difference between primary melanoma and metastatic melanoma expression was highly significant ( P < 0.001), indicating that loss of KAI1 or p27 may represent a relatively robust feature of more advanced melanomas.

By applying the post hoc comparison by Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test (Mann–Whitney test) when non alcohol-based mouthrinses were compared with the alcohol-based mouthrinses, there was highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).

clavatus was highly significant both in males and in females (CVA/MANOVA test, P < 0.001).

A Generalized Linear Model was used to estimate the effect of age group, race and rural status on the probability of missed HPV inoculation opportunity, all effects were highly significant as was the overall model (P<0.001).

The differences in absorbance between control and posttreatment samples of these combinations with thymol were highly significant in Pseudomonas aeruginosa 8 ( P < 0.001) and in Escherichia coli 2 ( P < 0.002).

In ED patients, the correlation between BMI and FMI estimated by the 4C model was low and not statistically significant ( r =0.47; P =0.1), whereas in controls this correlation was highly significant ( r =0.92; P <0.001).

In addition, Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity yielded a highly significant result (χ2 = 7238.63, df = 3321, p < 0.001), confirming that the observed correlation matrix was not an identity matrix and thus appropriate for structure detection via EFA (Table 2 ).

Our data on the likelihood of being sensitized in pairwise combinations showed highly significant correlations (p ≤ 0.001) between trees and grass, weeds and moulds, as well as between grass and weeds.

Concerning the number of immunolabeling cells for the CD4 and CD8 antigen (CD4 + , CD8 + T lymphocytes) of group G2 liver cells, a highly significant difference was observed ( p < 0.001) in comparison with group G3.

Notably, the variation between BA10 and BA44/45 was highly significant (*** p < 0.001).

In a pairwise comparison (independent samples t -test), the between-group difference of the MCS for HM and PCM was significant ( P =0.02) and highly significant for the differences between HM and carers, PCM and doctors, PCM and carers, and doctors and carers ( P <0.001).

This difference was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

All differences were highly significant (paired-samples Student’s t test p <0.001).

Among positive cases, presence of purulent frothy yellowish greenish vaginal discharge is highly significant characteristic ( P <0.001) of vaginal trichomoniasis.

falciparum (9.51%) infection was found highly significant (χ 2 = 1456, P< 0.001).

There is a moderate, yet highly significant correlation between Raven and CRT scores (Spearman's ρ = 0.306, p < 0.001) which suggests that they may have a common source, but do not capture the same cognitive skills.

Results Our results showed highly significant increase in the level of lipid peroxidation in group IV when com pared to the control group, group II and group III (p<0.001).

When the serum levels of thiocyanate in Group C was compared with Group II (142.71 ± 3.05 μM/l), highly significant difference was obtained (p<0.001).

3A ), but beta diversity was also highly significant ( r 2 = 0.50, P < 0.001) ( Fig. 3B ).

This difference was highly significant (F = 25.5, p < 0.001) when the data for the three sites was considered together, with a mean of 143.3 μg/L in those with CC and 83.8 μg/L for those with other benign diagnoses.