“highly significant”

The genetic differentiation coefficient among populations is 0.129 and is highly significant (P < 0.001, based on 1,000 permutations).

Germination percentage exhibited highly significant negative correlations with REL ( r = − 0.89, P < 0.001), MDA content ( r = − 0.92, P < 0.001), and pH ( r = − 0.85, P < 0.001).

The adjusted results showed that the risk of MetS in the Q2 and Q3 groups remained significantly lower than in the Q1 group, with adjusted OR (95% CI) of 0.77 (0.69–0.87) and 0.70 (0.61–0.80), both reaching highly significant levels ( P < 0.001).

The operative time reduction, by contrast, was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and provides unambiguous evidence of a learning effect.

GraphPad Prism 9.5 software was used for plotting, and statistical significance was expressed as * p ≤ 0.05, indicating significance; ** p ≤ 0.01, highly significant; *** p ≤ 0.001, extremely significant; **** p ≤ 0.0001; ns, there is no significant difference. 5.

The final model was highly significant, F(12, 255) = 68.41, p < 0.001, explaining 76.4% of the total variance (R 2 = 0.764).

As shown in Figure 4A there was a highly significant inverse correlation of TSH with FI ( p < .001).

The result was statistically very highly significant with a p value of <0.001.

( 2017 ), all sampled localities displayed highly significant deviations from Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium ( p = .001 for all).

These changes were highly significant in all comparisons ( p < 0.001).

The temporal trend component (year-month) was highly significant (edf = 7.633, F = 418.094, p < 0.001), confirming a substantial long-term decline in malaria incidence that is independent of climate effects.

The loci HA3 and HA13 showed highly significant P values (P < 0.001) after Bonferroni correction, therefore all further analyses were conducted without locus HA3, due to linkage disequilibrium ( Table 3 ). 3.2 Genetic diversity The related parameters of genetic diversity were calculated and summarized in Table 4 , Table 5 .

The difference between the sexes was highly significant (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001).

A weak, but highly significant, positive association between the number of days survived and the number of days with spittle excretions was detected (linear regression: F 1,29 = 30.44, p < 0.001, r 2 = 0.197; Figure 6 A).

In addition, Bartlett's test of Sphericity was highly significant χ 2 (210) = 9628.310 ( p < 0.001) ( 27 ).

Biochemical analysis ( Table-1 ) One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in the serum level of the studied parameters in the different animal groups (p<0.001).

These two grading systems showed a highly significant correlation (p < 0.001), although there were some discrepancies among Mandard TRG 2-4 and Becker 1b-2 ( S2 Table ).

Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside was down regulated in Golden Gate Wax (-2 log2FC) and Teebus-RR-1 (-1 log2FC) at 14-dpi, while highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) in Teebus-RR-1 and very significant in Golden Gate Wax (Fig. 4 d and Table S2 ).

The ANOVA revealed significant main effects of toothpaste formulation and composite type, as well as a highly significant interaction effect between these factors ( p < 0.001).

The average follow-up period was 12.1 ± 9.6 months, with preoperative and FFU back pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores showing highly significant improvement ( p<0.001 ).

6 , the two-way repeated measures revealed a highly significant main effect of time on the RA test, with a large effect size ( F = 458.36, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.96) Furthermore, there was a significant group × time interaction effect observed between the RS and FS groups, indicating different responses to the intervention over time ( F = 16.08, p = 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.45).

The Bartlett's test of sphericity matrix was highly significant ( p < .001); (b) Pearson correlation coefficient among 52 variables ranged from .35 to .698; (c) results of item correlation analysis showed that there was one item (Item 5—.295) with low corrected item-total correlation ( < .30; Cristobal et al., 2007 ).

Highly significant correlations were observed between the CTSI ( r = 0.926, P < 0.001), mCTSI ( r = 0.950, P < 0.001), and extrapancreatic necrosis volume ( r = 0.784, P < 0.001) imaging scores and the severity of pancreatitis estimated by the rAC (Figures 1 - 3 ), with mild, moderate, and severe disease indicated by values of 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

The most frequently used rules regarding the value of the test probability (p) were adopted, proving the statistical significance of the relationship under consideration: p < 0.05 means a statistically significant relationship; p < 0.01 means a highly significant relationship; p < 0.001 means a very highly statistically significant relationship.

However, the indices are not as good as those of the model in which item ATI4 was removed [�2 (33, N = 359) = 181, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.96, SRMR = 0.04] and the chi-squared difference is highly significant [��2 (9 = N = 359) = 51, p <.001].