“highly significant”

The subsequent signal-detection theory-based analysis bolstered this finding by revealing only a highly significant interceptor effect ( F [1, 13] ≈ 243.8, p < 0.001) for the AUC, but no significant effects for the criterion ( F [1, 13] ≈ 2.2, p > 0.05).

This effect is highly significant (p-value < 0.001).

Longitudinal Evaluation of CRT over Four Months of Faricimab Therapy The linear mixed-effects model revealed substantial reductions in central retinal thickness compared to baseline, with highly significant improvements observed at one month (β = −115.86, 95% CI : −143.36–−88.36, p < 0.001), two months (β = −147.83, 95% CI : −175.33–−120.32, p < 0.001), three months (β = −175.76, 95% CI : −203.26–−148.26, p < 0.001), and four months (β = −183.50, 95% CI : −211.00–−156.00, p < 0.001).

A 2 ( observer _sex) × 2 ( actor _sex) × 3 ( actor _success) analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed highly significant effects for the level of success ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant positive correlation was identified between DIN and ∑ 6 NEOs (r = 1.00, p < 0.001), likely attributable to the high DF (57.7%) and median concentration of DIN (7.31 ng/g).

Variations in landings were highly significant ( R 2 = 0.30, p < 0.001).

The Generalized Linear Model (GLM) analysis revealed highly significant main effects of the solvent type and concentration on M. incognita J2 mortality at both 24 h (χ 2 = 4115.9, df = 3, P < 0.001) and 48 h (χ 2 = 2547, df = 3, P < 0.001).

Independent of menopausal status, the difference in SI values between active and sedentary women was highly significant (p = 0.001), but that between sedentary and moderately active women was not (p = 0.065).

Birth cohort gave a highly significant contribution to this model (F = 24.16, p < 0.001), and gender and birth cohort significantly interacted (F = 2.64, p = 0.049).

When the nested design was conditioned on the eight covariates, household was still highly significant ( P = 0.001) and explained >36%.

Phenotypic Variation of the Segregating Populations Highly significant variation ( p < 0.001) for RCA was observed in all three F 2 populations across each of the three measurement times, with 42 days after sowing (DAS) showing the highest heritability ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 ( Table 1 ).

However, only hCRTAC1-A and dlCrtac1a caused a highly significant enhancement ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.005, respectively) in scratch recovery compared to the control cells ( Figure 1 B). 2.3.

These results suggest that the observed differences in the LC 50 among the organisms were not due to chance, with a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

The comparison of the inhibition activity according to the origin was not significant ( p > 0.05), while the comparison between all strains tested is very highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In contrast, a highly significant (p < 0.001) increase in the expression of the copia LTR-CAT constructs was observed in male larvae mutant for the recessive (hemizygous) X-linked mof 1 allele ( males absent on first ) (Table 5 ).

Relationship of Electrical Capacitance to Root Surface Area Highly significant positive linear correlations (F: 26.9–255; R 2 : 0.771–0.970; p < 0.001) were found between C R * and RSA for each wheat genotype and water supply ( Figure 6 ).

In the WHI Estrogen + Progestin Trial, use of CEE + MPA led to a 26% increase in breast cancer risk (38 vs 30 cases per 10,000 person-years) which was highly significant in the weighted analysis (P < 0.001) [ 121 ].

All tests showed that MWs affected formation of 53BP1 foci at highly significant levels ( p < 0.001).

MTX-treated rats showed a highly significant increase ( p < 0.001) in AST (82.5 ± 3.98), ALT (69.1 ± 1.38), and ALP (203.09 ± 5.43) levels compared with the control group.

In contrast, I–V relations in the presence of 1.8 mM Ca 2+ revealed a strong inward rectification with a highly significant larger R iCa of 1.68 ± 0.09 ( p < 0.001; Figure 3 B).

The storage period was considered a highly significant at (p < 0.001) effect across all traits.

A significant increase in appetite VAS score ( P = 0.04) and a highly significant reduction in CGI-S score was observed ( P < 0.001).

Generally, P < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 (**) was considered highly significant and P < 0.001 (***) was considered very highly significant.

Even at lower concentrations of NT‐3 (10, 25, or 50 ng/ml), there was a highly significant increase in the percentage of OPCs extending processes at all time points (Figure 4e ; Table 4 ; p ≤ 0.001).

Further, despite the wider variance, paired analysis indicates a highly significant difference between morning and afternoon pH values (p<0.001).