Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Just after the induction of anaesthesia, mean HR and MAP decreased further in both the groups and on analyzing the magnitude of decrease in hemodynamics, it was found to be highly significant on statistical comparison (P < 0.001) Although this study was conducted for conventional laryngoscopic intubation but found the stable hemodynamics with the use of dexmedetomidine.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The areas identified as hotspots of productivity also received a disproportionately high number of identified immigrants, with 45 of 65 individuals from 19 litters where a source of dispersal was identified, and that were of dispersal age (>5 months) being captured here, and 57 % of dispersal movements (>4 km) ending in these areas, despite them only representing 40 % of the total waterways, a highly significant difference from null expectation (χ 2 = 11.1, df = 1, p < 0.001).
highly significantP = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A constrained permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) (see Table S1 ) testing the influence of plant stage on microbial community composition (factoring out genotype) showed that sampling time or plant development had a highly significant effect on the microbial community composition ( P = 0.001).
highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Also, a GLM of some traits measured at 45 DAP, with the number of commercial roots (NCR) from mature field-grown plants in 2017, produced a highly significant ( p <0.001) positive relationship (NCR in field-grown plants = 3.469±0.707 + 0.409±0.233*NUNR (45 DAP) + 0.585±0.216*NLNR (45 DAP) + -0.226±0.113*TNR (45 DAP)), explaining 29.4% of the variation in NCR in the 2017 field screening.
highly significantP value = 0.00100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
On further analysis, statistically significant correlations were observed among the different periodontal parameters studied with the age and gender of the subjects and the predicted tobacco/nicotine dependence which included potential correlations among age and PPD ( P value = 0.0420), age and CAL ( P value = 0.0040), gender and GI ( P value = 0.0320), gender and OHI-S ( P value = 0.0210), GI and OHI-S ( P value = 0.0240), GI and PPD ( P value = 0.0180), and GI and CAL ( P value = 0.0050), while the results were found to be statistically highly significant in case of the correlations derived between OHI-S and CAL ( P value = 0.0010) and PPD and CAL ( P value = 0.0001) with several clinical implications of interest.