“highly significant”

The progression of LVDD was accompanied by a highly significant increase in the LA size and PASP compared with baseline values ( p < 0.001 for both variables).

There was a highly significant lowering of IOP in the first postoperative week, after 1 month, and after 1 year ( P =0.001).

Worsening was highly significant when compared to basal values (time sequence ARDS vs. basal value, BV; all p < 0.001 for each parameter respectively, in both lavaged groups), but comparable between the lavaged groups.

There was a highly significant improvement in angina 6 months following intervention in normal LVEF group ( p value < 0.001).

The Effect of Leaf Crude Extracts of Podocarpus gracilis on BGL of Normoglycemic Mice Except at 0 hours and 4 hours after exposure, the overall change (i.e., lowering) of BGL was significant ( p < 0.01) at all periods at a dose of 5 mg/kg GCL compared to the baseline BGL, a maximum reduction of 30.5% was observed at the fourth hour, with a highly significant ( p < 0.001) reduction across all periods (0 hours).

The pairwise comparisons of groups with ANOVAs supported these findings ( Table 3 ) and revealed highly significant differences between 4xA and all other groups ( p < 0.001) among all subsets of epiloci.

Positive Cyclin D1 was highly significant with PC (P value < 0.001) (Fig. 1 ).

While this was not observed for stage II and III rectal cancer patients without neoadjuvant therapy, it was highly significant for stage III colon carcinomas ( p < 0.001).

Relative expression peaked at day 2, exhibiting a highly significant upregulation ( p < 0.001).

At week 6 (the third harvest date), there was a highly significant interaction between treatments ( P = 0.001) indicating that plant species and temperature influenced the biomass of endophyte mycelia ( Tables 1 , 2 ).

Importantly, fluorescence quenching was significantly higher in −/− macrophages compared with +/+ macrophages, and, using a time-series analysis, the difference was highly significant at all time points ( P < 0.001).

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that ammonia nitrogen concentration had a highly significant effect on the ventilation frequency of rainbow trout ( F = 24.63, p < 0.001).

Furthermore, the ANOVA analysis revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences among the groups.

Thirty-day/in-house mortality rate was also highly significant in the POAF group (7.1% vs. 1.5%; p value < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

There were other highly significant links between FC-PU (β = 0.368, t = 8.809, p < 0.001) and FC-ATT (β = 0.146, t = 3.605, p < 0.001).

Over all loci, departure from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001), reflecting the deviation in the direction of heterozygote deficit.

For the FrAGe NE subscale, compared with time×CG, we found highly significant differences between time×REMOTION ( b =0.03; P <.001), but not for time×Res-Up!

By applying diaphragmatic US to those patients during SBT, authors found that during infancy period the measured DTF, diaphragmatic excursion and the total lung score showed highly significant correlations with weaning outcome ( p < 0.001).

Highly significant differences were observed among the groups with regard to body weight measured on day 20 and day 42 (p<0.001 and p<0.01, respectively).

Surgical procedure was a highly significant predictor of cohort membership (Nagelkerke R square = 0.755, p < 0.001), as 27 of 33 (82%) patients in the higher average MME cohort underwent a PAO procedure.

Based on the whole dataset, the correlation between the environmental variables and the community structure was highly significant (Mantel statistic, r = 0.60, P < 0.001).

The effect was highly significant on days 3 and 4 (P < 0.001) in IRJ 200 and 400 mg/kg treatment groups as compared to the respective time periods in the OKA group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001).

Dietary Patterns Identification First, the PCA method was performed, having KMO = 0.733 > 0.6 and a highly significant Bartlett test ( p < 0.001).

The differences between the MTX+ANA100 and HG in terms of these parameters were not statistically significant ( P >0.05), but the differences between the MTX+ANA50 and HG were found to be highly significant ( P <0.001).

Residual heterogeneity remained highly significant (QE(21) = 542.52, p < 0.001), and the omnibus test of moderator was non-significant (QM(6) = 0.25, p = 0.9997) (106).