“highly significant”

Overall Results The results of the previously defined fixed effects models were highly significant ( p < 0.001) in each of the three breeds studied.

The lagged dependent variable is also highly significant (p<0.001), underscoring the persistence of economic performance over time.

Ventilatory Parameter during Recovery The average respiratory exchange ratio (RER) showed no differences between women and men at all measurement points at the end of the recovery periods for all three HIIT protocols with the different lengths of active recovery periods (1 min recovery: women 1.11 ± 0.08, men 1.12 ± 0.10; 3 min recovery: women 1.02 ± 0.06, men 1.03 ± 0.05; 10 min: women 0.92 ± 0.06, men 0.93 ± 0.06) There was a highly significant decrease in the RER with an increase in the recovery period from one to three and to ten min ( p < 0.001). 4.

The intergroup comparison of the mean time taken to extract the teeth elicited a statistically highly significant difference (P < 0.001), which was preserved even when the time taken for gingival retraction in the conventional group was not taken into consideration ( Table 1 ). 2.

In Model 1, the administered LEN dose demonstrated a strong and highly significant positive correlation with plasma LEN ( P < .001), both before ( Fig. 1A ) and after adjustment for both SETs of covariates.

For both energy models (LMM LEClaw , LMM LECar ), the interaction term was highly significant ( P <0.001; Table S2 ) and six individual post hoc models (LMMD EnergyClaw , LMMD EnergyCar , LMMBD EnergyClaw , LMMBD EnergyCar , LMMNP EnergyClaw , LMMNP EnergyCar ) further tested the effect of claw and carapace size on the energy of the three behavioural groups whilst controlling for repeated measures.

Over time, [ 3 H]cholesterol efflux to apoA-I (20 μg mL −1 ) and HDL (20 μg mL −1 ) adhered strictly to linearity ( Figure 1 C) with highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences noted between the slope of each curve. 3.2.

The differences in infection prevalence across the eight age groups were highly significant ( p <0.001).

= 1, p = 0.035), but highly significant in 2008 (Pearson's χ 2 = 14.67, d.f. = 1, p < 0.001).

The highly significant main effect of Goal Type, F (1, 104) = F (1, 104) = 19.69, p < .001, η p 2 = .159, indicated that participants adopted (falsely self-ascribed) more recommendations of intrinsic compared to extrinsic goals: M intrinsic = 46.45% (24.65) vs.

The effect of light intensity on PhCs accumulation, estimated by image analysis of fluorescence intensity, was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Table 1 ) such that plants grown under HL conditions had on average a 46% greater accumulation of PhCs.

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the equation was sufficient to predict production under any combination of variable values.

In contrast, UBC821 had the lowest values in the corresponding areas (Supplementary Table S2). Analysis of molecular variance exposed highly significant genetic intra-population differences with a percentage of 71% ( p< 0.001).

Results were considered significant when p < 0.05 (*), highly significant when p < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant when p < 0.001 (***). 5.

Although the mRNA level of ALAS1 in liver was less in +/− than WT this was statistically only just significant ( p 0.049) whereas the difference in brain was highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Fig. 5 D).

Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire and Modified PMS Scale, analysing pre - and post-intervention symptoms through descriptive statistics, paired t-tests and chi-square tests. The intervention significantly reduced PMS severity, with mild PMS cases increasing from 48 (20.78%) to 166 (71.86%) post-intervention. Paired t-tests revealed a highly significant mean difference in PMS scores (T = 12.251, p < 0.001).

Importantly, a highly significant Group × Item Type interaction ( F (1, 1795) = 23.43, p < 0.001) was observed.

The degree of correlation between the two assessors was highly significant ( ρ = 0.54, n = 88, p < 0.001).

A two-tailed paired t test revealed this difference to be highly significant ( P < 0.001).

This model had little explanatory power and a poor fit, as is common for bivariate logistic regression (McFadden’s Pseudo R 2 0.039, AUC 0.697, and a highly significant Hoslem’s test p<0.001).

The comparison shows a highly significant association ( P < 0.001) between the cluster solution and the engaged well-being categories.

There was a highly significant association between anti-RgpA and anti-PPAD antibodies (using the quantitative data of dilution 1:400) and RA diagnosis ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 2 ).

For fixation duration, there was a highly significant effect of AOI type (F(1,29)=54.23, p <.001) and painting group (F(2,58)=15.16, p <.001).

The main effect of time pressure was also significant, F (1, 151) = 12.88, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.081, indicating a highly significant difference between the time pressure group and the time delay group ( p < 0.001).

The association of MVPs with various histological types was also highly significant (p<.001).