“highly significant”

Results are presented as mean ± S.E., with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 highly significant, and p < 0.001 very highly significant.

Simple main effect analysis demonstrated that, in controls, differences between self and other were highly significant at Pz ( F 1,20 = 13.85, p = 0.001).

Both its linear and quadratic effects were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The ANOVA results show a very highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between the nine strains with respect to the inhibition of DPPH radical ( Figure 5 ).

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.8216 and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant (χ2 = 2521.078, df = 22, p < 0.001), demonstrating that the factor analysis was adequate to the data. 2.3.

P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant difference, P value of <0.01 was considered to be highly significant difference and P value of <0.001 was considered to be extremely significant difference.

As for the direct effect of sex on decomposition use, it was highly significant before the mediator was entered in the model ( p < .001); once the mediator was added, the direct effect decreased but remained significant ( p = .02), indicating partial mediation (see Figure 1 A).

Significant statistical differences were found with regard to smoking index ( P <0.03), and highly significant differences were observed in sUA, oxygen saturation, PO 2 , percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), FEV 1 % and PEFR% ( P <0.001).

The results revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) among sensors for all three climatic variables, confirming the presence of pronounced spatial heterogeneity within the greenhouse.

However, when comparisons were made by race instead of survey group, the differences in consumption of any seafood become highly significant ( χ 2 , P = 0.001).

The differences in rates were highly significant between the regions (p<0.001).

ILD tests for both the combined molecular, and combined molecular and morphological data sets partitioned simultaneously into separate loci/morphology were also highly significant (P < 0.001).

This difference is highly significant and is equal to an effect size of 2.26 (t(367)=30,627, p<0.001).

For the soil depth treatment, we observed a highly significant main effect of soil depth, with deep soils having much higher NPP than shallow soils ( F 1,40 = 52.01, p < .001).

No significant difference was identified between first and second 40 km endurance exercise ( p = 0.984), however, comparing both first and second 40 km endurance horses to trotter horses separately confirmed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

The difference in mean number of methylated genes in the cancer group (8.41 (95% CI 7.62–9.20)) vs the total control group (4.74 (95% CI 4.40–5.08)) was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

All four independent variables had a highly significant effect on gene expression ( P < 0.001).

Among the three highly significant outcomes ( p < .001), the average student response score was 3.41 while the average faculty response score was 4.19, a difference of 0.78 on the five-point Likert scale.

Of these, six cancer types showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) upregulation of the AE2 mRNA (Fig.

The response “no other treatments available” was highly significant ( P = .001), and this meant patients with gastrointestinal cancers were more likely to answer that they were interested in phase 1 trials because there were no alternatives.

Indeed, additional analyses revealed that although there was no difference between Lithuanian and Scottish participants’ homophobia levels when perceived importance of family values was low (simple slope = −.01, SE = .18, t = −.07, p = .95), this difference was highly significant when perceived importance of family values was high (simple slope = −1.03, SE = .17, t = −5.87, p < .001).

The effects of TNA and CSAF on muscle fiber characteristics of pigs were highly significant ( p <0.001).

The difference across main branches was highly significant (χ 2 (3) = 63.5, p < 0.001; Cohen’s w = 0.63, large effect).

Highly significant results (P > 0.001) were found in all growth and yield parameters.

The correlation between rFel d 1 and native cat extract was highly significant (coefficient = 0.896 with p < 0.001).