“highly significant”

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.001.

IL-6 exhibited a highly significant and inverse correlation with FEV1 ( r =−0.580, P =0.001).

In primordial follicles, BMAL1 and CLOCK increases were significant (p<0.05) and CRY-1 and PER-1 were highly significant (p<0.001), and CRY-2 did not reach significance.

The highly significant changes ( p < 0.001) in DTI metrics and FT were most notable in the corticostriatal tract which connects the superior frontal and parietal cortex with the striatum; WM tract connecting inferior frontal cortex and superior frontal cortex; and superior longitudinal fasciculus connecting parietal and frontal lobe ( Figure 3 ).

Gender played a vital role, with females exhibiting higher acceptance (n = 166) compared to males (n = 72), which was a highly significant difference (p < 0.001).

All three independent variables had a highly significant contribution to the model (age and gender together accounted for 18% of the variability, partial correlation between health status and 6MWT-distance = -0.40, p < 0.001).

Results The results showed highly significant correlations between the TAS-26 subscale “difficulty in identifying feelings” and the ERQ scale “suppression” (r = 0.5; p < 0.001) and between the TAS-26 subscale “difficulty in describing feelings” and the ERQ scale “suppression” (r = 0.64; p < 0.001).

There is a highly significant linear relationship ( r = 0.671; P < 0.001) between decreasing dietary CP and increasing relative abdominal fat-pad weights in birds offered maize-based diets.

Additionally, Bartlett’s test of sphericity was used to analyze the adequacy of correlations between items and was found highly significant, χ 2 (1275) = 8763.11; p < 0.001.

This effect persisted and intensified over time, reaching highly significant differences at 5 h (*** p < 0.001 in A2058; *** p < 0.001 in A375).

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was also highly significant (χ 2 (496) = 12,555.65, p < 0.001), confirming that the correlation matrix was factorable.

Overall, the correlation between POCT-Hb and Hb-ZL was highly significant ( r = 0.96, p <0.001).

Relationship of Electrical Capacitance to Root Surface Area Highly significant positive linear correlations (F: 26.9–255; R 2 : 0.771–0.970; p < 0.001) were found between C R * and RSA for each wheat genotype and water supply ( Figure 6 ).

A highly significant correlation ( p ≤ 0.001) was observed between SOD and POD (positive).

This analysis revealed a highly significant time × group interaction (F(1, 34) = 149.513, P < .001, η p 2 = 0.815), confirming that the trajectory of change in Cobb angle over the four-month period was significantly different between the SEG and TEG.

Likelihood-ratio tests comparing each model with ordinary logistic regression were highly significant (all p < 0.001).

Correlation Between AFABP Levels and Birth Weight, Gestational Age, and Z-Score of Birth Weight Cord blood A-FABP [ 16 ] was highly significant, negatively correlated with birth weight and gestational age (both P -values < 0.001, r = -0.668 and r = -0.691), but not with z-score of birth weight ( P = 0.37, r = -1.02).

Statistical analysis of susceptibility tests revealed that insecticide type was the primary determinant of mortality, with a highly significant main effect ( F (3,49) = 46.74, p < 0.001).

In contrast, there was a highly significant 21.1% difference between mean (±SD) TM-VO 2pred and HRI-VO 2 (8.12±1.85 METs and 6.71±1.92, respectively; p<0.001).

LOS locus class E and H are genetically closely related [ 11 ] and an analysis of these two classes as one group showed a highly significant overrepresentation of such isolates among the shared Sma I types ( P = 0.001).

The main effect of chord type was highly significant ( F (2,92) = 26.73, p < .001, η G 2 = 0.03).

The correlation between the BNSS total and the GAF total remained highly significant ( r = -0.62, p < 0.001).

Physical Condition Improvement As shown in Table 1 , there was a highly significant decrease of the Ruffier index between V1 and V3 ( p < 0.001), observed both in the treated and in the placebo group, following intragroup analysis.

Simple main effect analysis demonstrated that, in controls, differences between self and other were highly significant at Pz ( F 1,20 = 13.85, p = 0.001).

Results and Discussion As shown in Table 1 phosphorus treatment (P) and location (LON) had highly significant effects on the measured variable ( P < 0.001).