“highly significant”

All pairwise estimates were highly significant ( p < 0.001; Supplementary Table S5 ).

Furthermore, sperm viability and organelle functionality showed a decrease after thawing, displaying highly significant differences between 0 and 2 hours post-thawing: YOPRO-1-/PI-, t(32) = 11.47, p<0.001; MT+, t(32) = 6.26, p<0.001; and PNA-, t(32) = 11.18, p<0.001 ( Table 2 ).

There were highly significant phylogenetic signals in both FS 1 ( P = 0.001) and FS 2 ( P = 0.002), implying that both approaches showed statistical dependency due to the species’ phylogenetic relationships.

Due to the non-comparability of the permutation network parameters to the initially observed network parameter, the differences recorded between Cabernet Sauvignon IR and Cabernet Sauvignon D are highly significant (p < 0.001).

[ 28 ] assessed this combination for managing internal derangement of the TMJ and reported a highly significant (p<0.001) improvement in pain and function compared to diclofenac.

Results show a highly significant decrease in ΔT 1 (p<0.001) after bedrest in all IVDs, and in all areas of the IVDs.

In general, a highly significant change in HR from baseline after cutting of the spermatic cord was discovered in groups P (p < 0.001), L (p = 0.002), B (p < 0.001) and M (p < 0.001) compared to that in group NaCl.

In order to examine the sources of total intersexual variation in fitness, we fitted a three-way mixed-effect model, which indicated a highly significant sex-by-isoline by inbreeding stage interaction (likelihood ratio test, χ 2 2 = 23.173, P < 0.001).

The differences in the PI, TTP, MTT, slope and AUC were significant; of note, differences for the PI and AUC were highly significant (p<0.001).

The trend toward housing improvement was also expressed in the highly significant drop in houses having tarred-cardboard roofs, from 52.9% to 31.6% over 0–78 MPS (χ 2 = 40.5, df = 2, p < 0.001), which were replaced by corrugated metal-sheet roofs ( Table 2 ).

Correlations Between the Clinical Judgment on Each of the Three Dimensions of SA and the Score on the Corresponding Subscale of the SAMAS Results of Pearson’s r correlation analyses show a highly significant positive correlation between the declarative score obtained on the SAMAS and the clinical judgment of declarative SA ( r = 0.67; p < 0.001) as well as between score for the anticipatory items of the SAMAS and the clinical judgment of anticipatory SA ( r = 0.62; p < 0.001).

Correlation between knowledge of COVID-19, practices of personal protective equipment and hand hygiene, and implications of COVID-19 in dental treatment The correlations between knowledge and practices, knowledge and dental implications, and practice and dental implications were positive and highly significant ( P < 0.001) with maximum between dental implications and practice ( r = 0.455) and minimum between dental implications and knowledge ( r = 0.338) [ Table 5 ].

The viscosity variations were highly significant over the hemicycles (F 2.7,53.2 = 16.431, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.45), but no effects were detected for the interaction between hemicycle and group (F 2.7,53.2 = 0.794, p = 0.489, η 2 p = 0.04).

Results Overall, the FHSQ pain subscale exhibited the highest responsiveness, as evidenced by a highly significant paired t -test ( p <0.001), Cohen’s d = 0.63 (medium effect size), SRM = 0.50 (medium effect size) and Guyatt index = 1.70 (huge effect size).

Dietary levels had highly significant (p<0.001) on percentage of DM, moisture, ash, protein and fat.

Foveal width was the only parameter where diagnosis of ROP had a significant effect, with a highly significant interaction between absence/presence of ROP and PMA ( P < 0.001).

A highly significant difference was observed between the different age groups and the mean DMFT ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

Presence of step parents and substance use in the family was seen to be a risk factor for substance abuse and the association was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The frequency that colonies were fed was highly significant, with only colonies fed every other week suffering reduced growth relative to the other two treatment levels ( p < .001 in both post hoc comparisons).

The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that total variation was highly significant ( p < 0.001) within individuals i.e. 63.17% (Table 6 ).

The confidence level of study was proposed to be 95%; hence, p-value < 0.05 has been considered significant, p-value < 0.01 has been considered highly significant and p-value <0.001 has been considered very highly significant.

abdominal pain, nausea, belching, bloating and flatulence, were all highly significant (Somer’s d (t) = 6.43 – 40.05, p <0.001), and interestingly the weakest correlation was found for abdominal pain (t = 6.43).

In NAF condition, there was a highly significant negative association between k values and the mean of the absolute values of ΔF2 for each PWS and each place of articulation ( r = −0.636, p < 0.001 for Pearson product-moment uncorrected scores, based on 63 observations).

In group B, out of 15 patients, 12 patients had attained normal skin color, which was statistically highly significant at the level of P < 0.001, also one patient had mild improvement and two patients have moderate improvement.

Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) among the genotypes, blocks and its interaction for all the traits studied showed that a wide and significant variation existed among the genotypes and traits.