“highly significant”

Sex effects revealed a highly significant ( p = 0.000) AUC in all the groups even at each time point.

The results showed that, though the different weed control methods did not significantly (p>0.05) influence soil infiltration rate, when combined with tillage systems in a factorial design, there was a highly significant interaction effect, p < 0.000, F (6) = 5.530 ( Table 6 ).

The mean value of number of oral neutrophils was found to be highly significant (p = 0.000) among healthy and severe periodontitis, gingivitis and severe periodontitis, mild periodontitis and severe periodontitis, and moderate periodontitis and severe periodontitis [ Table 5 and Graph 2 ].

It is worth noting that the difference with the control group was highly significant with combo ( p = 0.000) (Fig. 2 C, Supplementary Table S3 ).

Though the difference at rest was highly significant ( p = 0.000), the difference at effort was not far from being not significant ( p = 0.049).

ANOVA assessment showed that the constructed D-optimal quadratic model is highly significant with a p -value ≤ 0.000.

The highly significant effect is of actual behavior on academic performance as (β = 0.558, t value = 9.571, p values = 0.000, p < .01).

A one-way ANOVA established that there was a highly significant difference between the concentrations of ssDNA released when spores were treated with varying microwave exposures for DS1813 ( p = 0.000), and DS1684 ( p = 0.035).

Nonparametric statistics suggests a z value of −3.774 with a highly significant P = 0.000.

But using acidic extract, irradiation of fabric and extract ( p = 0.000) and variation in treatment, that is, RE, NRE, RFRF and NRF are highly significant ( p = 0.000).

On follow up, raised mean MVD was seen in those cases with relapse/deceased as compared to disease-free patients, which was highly significant (p = 0.000).

In the experimental group, there was a highly significant difference in total caries experience (deft + DMFT) (p = 0.000), with a reduction in the mean number of decayed teeth (dt + DT) and missing teeth (et + MT) scores, along with an increase in filled teeth (ft + FT) scores after 12 months.

The test of Sphericity was highly significant with χ2 = 193.8970 and p < 0.000.

In relation to CLP levels and disease severity, a highly significant positive correlation was found among CLP levels and VASI score ( r = 0.833, P = 0.000) ( Table 3 ).

By day 7, the mean pain score reduced in both groups; however, Group B continued to show significantly less pain (0.33 ± 0.47) compared to Group A (3.53 ± 0.68), with the difference remaining highly significant (p = 0.00).

Results The obtained results revealed a highly significant increase in serum cTn I in diseased cattle with TP and TRP ( P = 0.00), while buffaloes with TP showed no significant changes in serum cTn I ( P = 0.111).

Using post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test when Group I (Zirconomer) and Group II (Hi-Dense) were compared, there were statistically highly significant differences found ( P = 0.000).

pepo L.) The results (Table 1 ) show a very highly significant decrease (p = 0.000) in the average length and average dry weight of the embryonic axes of zucchini seedlings under the influence of metal-induced stress in the medium.

B-ALL cases exhibited a highly significant association between the methylation pattern and its mRNA expression (p = 0.000).

After adjusting for age and gender in his study, there was a highly significant difference between stage IV patients and stage I patients (HR = 8.81, 95% CI: 3.20-24.22, p = 0.000) ( 49 ).

The association between the histopathological report and RIPASA score was found to be statistically highly significant (p=0.000).

But in the case, DSG3 marker detection, an almost perfect agreement between both the observers, was seen with an ICC value of 0.921 and it is highly significant with a P value = 0.000.

The FEV1/FVC ratio was also highly significant (F = 45.054, p = 0.000).

Again analysis of variance test was highly significant ( P =.000) for the knowledge score and the level in the college of the participants but not significant for the attitude and the level in the college of the participants, as the P value was. 301, as shown in Table 4 .

Results After one year of Homeopathic treatment, reduction in serum IgE level (1006.83±395.17 versus 336.5±126.96), absolute eosinophil count (600.33±103.61 versus 302.5±82.21) and symptom score (30.27±5.12 versus 12.83±2.72) were statistically highly significant (paired t test; t 29 = 10.84, 18.17 & 22.37 respectively; P = 0.0000) with 95% confidence level.