Barely Significant
← all phrases

highly significant

26,559 sentences · 26,559 papers · 156,979 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
The mean value of the responses to the questions related to the overall experience of the pain before visiting the pain clinic was 3.81 ± 1.42 and after visiting the pain clinic was 2.14 ± 1.05 which was highly significant ( P = 0.000).
highly significantP < 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
The mean mandibular condyle inclination (Table 5 ) in horizontal (HCI) and vertical (VCI) planes demonstrated highly significant differences between both groups with P < 0.000, while anteroposterior mandibular condyle inclination (APCI) showed no significance in which horizontal and vertical condyle inclinations relative to horizontal (HP) and vertical planes (VP) were higher in the TMD group (6.32 ± 3.60 and 79.39 ± 6.20°, respectively) than the non-TMD group (4.41 ± 2.48 and 75.08 ± 6.60°, respectively).
highly significantP =0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
Similarly, total consumption and total number of analgesic doses were lower in group L than in group F and were highly statistically significant [ Table 3 ].There was no significant difference in the Aldrete score between the groups ( P > 0.05) in PACU, but the time taken to achieve an Aldrete score >9 was shorter in group L (7.41±1.80min) than in group F (13.13±2.09min) and was highly significant statistically ( P =0.000).
highly significantp-value<10 –3070.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Treatment of WT U-2 OS cells with arsenite showed a highly significant and global shortening of RNA upon stress (Mann–Whitney, p-value<10 –307 ) in stark contrast to ΔΔG3BP1/2 cells that showed substantially less shortening (Mann–Whitney, p-value<10 –5 ) ( Figure 6e , Figure 6—figure supplement 1g and h ).
highly significantP =9.78e-2630.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Both population ( P =1.88e-238) and OA ( P =0.000e+00) had highly significant effects on survivorship, and there was a significant population×OA interaction ( P =9.78e-263; Table 2 , Fig. 3 ), with populations responding differently to OA.