“highly significant”

The ROC curve for RPW and secretory activity, with area under curve (AUC) 0.813, 95%CI (0.672–0.953), was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001), and the cut-off value was 47.5% and above, with a sensitivity of 73.3%, 95%CI (44.9–92.0%), and the specificity was 86.2%, 95%CI (68.3–96.0%).

Those treated in the ICU (mean = 3.36, SD = 1.64) scored lower on the Ordinal Clinical Progression Scale than those who were not (mean = 3.65, SD = 1.55) and the difference was highly significant (t = -1.790, p < 0.001).

All the differences were statistically significant (Wilcoxon signed-rank test z = −4.376; −4.379; −4.234; −4.200; −4.375; respectively, all P < 0.001 highly significant).

Result: At 90 days, Study Group shows >5% weight reduction in 45%, 35% in 45%, 0.334/week or 1.34/month, Highly Significant weight reduction, p <0.001, Improvement in BMI, p <0.001; W/H Ratio, p <0.001; Skin-fold Triceps, Subscapular, Suprailiac, p <0.001, (Biceps p <0.05), Qualitative features viz.

A one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference among the three groups’ mean scores for overall attitudes (ANOVA p = 0.001).

( 2022 ) reported highly significant genetic variation ( p < 0.001) in traits closely related to pod characteristics, such as grain yield, reinforcing the role of genetic diversity in shaping pod weight and yield potential among landraces (Donkor et al. 2022 ). 3.1.3 100‐Seed Weight The results for 100‐Seed Weight of groundnut landraces are presented in Table 1 .

The association between overall mortality and increasing age remained highly significant when adjusted for underlying co-morbidities or immunosuppression (p = 0.001).

The mean reduction of 0.89 mg/dL (95% CI: 0.76 to 1.03) was also highly significant (t(238) = 12.991, p < 0.001).

For fat content, highly significant differences were also detected in fat content among the cultivars (p value < 0.001).

The results of the Chi square showed that the Wald statistics are highly significant ( χ 2 ( 9 , 378 ) = 33.83 ; p < 0.001 ) , even though the pseudo r 2 = 0.0903.

Goodness of fit of the data were very good and all the structural coefficients were highly significant ( P <0.001).

Across both pairs of samples and three independent experiments, the reduction in mAb7a/3B11 ratio was highly significant (mean reduction 45.8%, p < 0.001, paired t test, n = 9 bands per condition).

mg -1 ). Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s test confirmed a highly significant difference between specific activity of IFN_E78C and native interferon ( P <0.001). with a mean difference of 123.7 million IU. mg -1 (95% CI: 106.7 to 140.7).

Chi-square analysis indicated a highly significant result with p < 0.001 (Table 5 , Figure 4 ).

All group differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test).

Similar results were found for all three CRIES-13 subscales (see Table 2 ). Mothers’ trauma symptoms and ratings of children’s trauma symptoms In our sample, there was a highly significant positive association between the mother’s own PTSD-symptom load and their rating of the child’s PTSD symptoms ( β = .52, p < .001), even after controlling for the child’s age, gender, self-reported PTSD symptoms or living situation.

A highly significant difference of opinion exists between PHECC practitioners and EM consultants in relation to this issue ( p < 0.001).

While visual inspection did not suggest non-normality or heteroskedasticity, the Shapiro-Wilks and Breusch-Pagan tests were statistically highly significant ( P -value <0.001 for both).

There were highly significant differences between CLD patients and healthy control groups in terms of LFT, IGF-1 and 25- OH D ( p < 0.001 ).

Statistical significance was set as follows: * p < 0.05 indicates significant difference, ** p < 0.01 indicates highly significant difference, *** p < 0.001 indicates highly significant difference; when p > 0.05, it was labeled as n.s., which indicated that the difference between groups was not statistically significant. 3.

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) The Sample 1 ( n = 5373) satisfied the requirements for carrying out a factor analysis, since the KMO value (0.94) was greater than 0.70 and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was also highly significant (χ2 = 73,832.02, df = 276, and p < 0.001).

Regarding age emerged as a highly significant predictor (p<0.001), with older patients tending to score higher on the Caprini scale.

The results demonstrated that CAR was a highly significant predictor of CAD-RADS level (Estimate = 11.924, Wald χ 2 = 47.411, p < 0.001).

GLM Procedure (SAS) showed that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and the r 2 was 0.84.

At 10 DAV, vaccinated groups 3 and 4 demonstrated highly significant differences in IgT greater than the control group by 74.68 ± 14.08- and 56.92 ± 16.64-fold, respectively ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 3 B).