As shown in Figure 7 and Table 6 , USAT was the only variable that remained highly significant in the model (OR=2.87, 95% CI: 2.18–3.78, P < 0.001), indicating that for every 0.1-unit increase in USAT, the likelihood of being classified into a higher QCT category nearly tripled.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Radial strain analysis showed a highly significant decrease in control mice as compared to α-TOH-treated mice, both globally (control: 7.5 ± 3.5 vs α-TOH: 30.8 ± 5.9% PK, ***p < 0.001) and in infarct areas (anterior and apex) (control: 3.0 ± 2.5 vs α-TOH: 23.7 ± 5.3% PK, ***p < 0.001).
Cox regression analyses showed that uEGF/Cr ratio is inversely associated with the risk of graft failure (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.59‒0.78] per ng/mg) and this association is highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Considering total scale scores and correlation of the subscales of the scale, reliability coefficients ranged from r=0.54 to r=0.78; the correlation was positive, strong and highly significant (p<0.001) ( Table 2 ).
Differences in ISR total score and sub-scores between admission and discharge/follow-up were statistically highly significant (paired t -test) with p -values < 0.001 (***), with a minor exception for “eating disorder” where differences between admission and follow-up had a p -value of < 0.5 (*).
However, the study of the correlation between population density and the number of positive COVID-19 rapid tests showed a highly significant relationship between the two variables, with a Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient of 0.795 ( P < 0.001) ( Table 3 ).
The results were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05, highly significant if P < 0.001, and extremely significant if P < 0.0001.
Sway area, AP sway, and ML sway showed highly significant differences in the Kruskal–Wallis test ( p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively).
Moderating effect of indecisiveness on rumination and depressive symptoms Utilizing a robust Wald test, the overall model fit was highly significant, R 2 = 0.54, χ 2 (9) = 268.46, p < 0.001.
For TyG-BMI, the nonlinear relationship with all-cause mortality was highly significant (nonlinear P < .001), with a marked increase in mortality risk when TyG-BMI exceeded 215.145 (HR = 1.00, P = .031).
The correlations between the phantom and the StarGuide were highly significant; 0.94 for the LV TAC and 0.89 for the myocardium TAC, p < 0.001, showing the high sensitivity of the StarGuide to track the physiological changes in the radiotracer concentration over time.
pelagicus was found within individuals, and highly significant in all cases (F IT = 0.125–0.19, P<0.001).
One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc tests confirmed highly significant differences (p < 0.001) in all metabolic markers across clusters ( Figures 2D–J ).
The main effect of the factor was highly significant ( F (3, 561) = 104.64, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.36), showing that scores differ substantially across FOUND dimensions.
That the responses of the varieties to different light conditions were influenced by both genotype and light quality was confirmed by two-way ANOVA, showing a highly significant interaction (p ≤ 0.001) between the factors analyzed (see results in Table 6 ).
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of G6PD in Both Protocols Over Time Comparisons between T120, T150, and T180 for both protocols showed extremely high ICC values (ranging from 0.967 to 0.996), all with highly significant p ‐values ( p < 0.001) (Table 2 ). 3.3.
RESULTS The NOT-P, MNA ® scores, TC, HDL, iron, and Vitamin D 3 levels ranked higher in the controls, followed by mild/moderate/severe periodontitis groups, with highly significant (HS) differences ( P < 0.001).
The difference between the two cell clones is highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The analysis showed that 26 GRDEGs had highly significant expression differences between SLE and control samples (p value < 0.001).
However, the difference was highly significant when related to distal roots of 1 st and 2 nd molars (P< 0.001).
Both the results for V V and N V show statistically highly significant differences as confirmed by two-sample T tests (both p < 0.001).
The difference in fluoride released from compomer in deionized water vs artificial saliva and in pH cycling model vs deionized water and artificial saliva were highly significant (p < 0.001).
In all the cases, the LRTs were highly significant ( p -values < 0.001).
Semiquantification of alizarin via CPC revealed a highly significant increase of calcium deposition of the cultures incubated OMT compared to cultures of the OM, OMTA and all basal media (in all cases p < 0.001).
Root length density of cover crop variants The ANOVA results revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect of the CC variants and year on the RLD at 0–60 cm and the top 0–10 cm at RUZ and LUK, whereas the effect was not significant at subsoil depths of 40–50 and 50–60 cm.