Excretion of cortisol in HFA group showed no significant alteration from the control group (Phase I: 43.8 ± 4.43 vs 46.5 ± 6.60, 95% CI 43.16-49.84 P = 0.179; Phase II: 21.1 ± 2.87 vs 22.5 ± 2.52, 95% CI 21.22-23.78 P = 0.352; Phase III: 9.9 ± 1.20 vs 9.0 ± 0.97, 95% CI 8.51-9.49 P = 0.177, post-hoc Bonferroni test) but showed a highly significant alteration at the phases I (74.3 ± 8.62 vs 46.5 ± 6.60, P < 0.001), II (62 ± 7.68 vs 22.5 ± 2.52, P < 0.001), and III (40 ± 5.73 vs 9 ± 0.97, P < 0.001) when compared to LFA group.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Our data showed a highly significant negative correlation between hypervolemia and IVVCI (p < 0.001).
In the 7 DAI, a highly significant abundance of GA 12 was observed in the laser-irradiated seeds than control with a fold change of 0.13 (*** p < 0.001) and found consistently higher in the irradiated seeds with a fold change of 0.10,0.13 and 0.03 respectively (* p < 0.05) (Fig. 6 c) in 14–28 DAI.
However, the analysis did show a highly significant (p<0.001) negative correlation between SerpinB2 and T-bet mRNA levels ( Fig. 3B ).
The difference in proportion between perceived and actual BMI was highly significant (p<0.001).
The difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Furthermore, highly significant reductions of both the E058Δ iucA Δ iutA and E058Δ iucC Δ iutA double mutants were observed in all five tested tissues ( P <0.001).
Moreover, prior formal education or training on Mpox showed a highly significant association with knowledge levels (p < 0.001).
faecalis (17.2 ± 0.65), and the difference between the groups related to the antibacterial activity was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
With respect to the valence ANOVA there was, unsurprisingly a highly significant effect [ F (1, 60) = 178.87, p < 0.001].
**, difference significant with p < 0.01 ***, difference highly significant with p < 0.001.
The statistical comparison of observed and expected additive toxicities, with respect to toxicity unit (TU difference), using Student’s t -test, was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The current study found the effects of frequency of use to be highly significant ( p < 0.001 for QoL, and p = 0.01 for depression).
Furthermore, all products’ amylose content is highly significant at p < 0.001.
The younger groups in this survey (aged 18–34 years) showed highly significant differences regarding the reasons to vaccinate or not vaccinate between the adherent and the hesitant ( p < 0.001).
Overall, 55 of 78 offspring (70.5%) inherited the pathogenic variant, representing a highly significant deviation from Mendelian expectations ( p < 0.001; 95% CI: 60.4%–80.6%).
The effect of history of recent hypercholesterolemia treatment was highly significant in the GLMs of both outcomes ( p < 0.001), and the achieved statistical power was β = 64.5 and β = 74.2 for LDL-C and TC, respectively.
In Model 1-A, log_MC is a highly significant predictor of R&D expenditure (β = 0.748; p < .001), reinforcing the substantial role of firm size in shaping innovation capacity.
Highly significant ( P < 0.001) correlations between treatments were observed for the length traits leaf length, plant height, root length and both ratio traits.
Two discriminant functions were obtained: the first function presented a lower Wilks’ lambda (value = 0.262), and the test was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
These differences were highly significant based on the ANOVA conducted [ p < 0.001].
The association between the exposure to both parasites was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
There was a highly significant correlation between BMI and fat mass, measured by DEXA (r = 0.85; p<0.001).
Subset analysis indicated that the increase of RNR treated by C-PEI was highly significant compared with the sham group (P<0.001), moderately significant compared with the 2 mL ethanol group (P=0.048), but not significant compared with the low PTX dose group (P=0.307).
In contrast, the CPP for domestic Canadian papers was 16.99, a highly significant difference (P<0.001).