“highly significant”

In contrast, these delta-scores were negative and highly significant for both the rBPD (−0.63 ± 0.53, t (25) = 5.58, p < 0.001) and cBPD (−0.33 ± 0.36, t (21) = −4.62, p < 0.001) groups.

The Spearman correlations (r s ) showed highly significant associations between the data of consecutive sampling points (r s = 49 to 66%; p < 0.001).

Moreover, the HFE score showed a highly significant positive correlation with the EB score (r = 0.573, p < 0.001) and the FM score (r = 0.384, p < 0.001).

For birth weight, the unstandardized coefficient is 0.000 with a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.001), indicating that birth weight is a significant predictor of breastfeeding duration among women of low-risk pregnancy.

In the case of each debate, the difference in assessment between the two groups of supporters was highly significant (χ 2 = 255.52, P < 0.001; χ 2 = 257.28, P < 0.001, respectively), and both groups differed from undecided voters (all χ 2 s > 19.84, P s < 0.001).

There was no significant correlation found between cases and searches at day 7 ( P = 0.178) but highly significant, strong correlations at days 12 ( r = 0.978, P ≤ 0.001) and nineteen ( r = 0.973, P ≤ 0.001).

Moreover, an acute effect was observed in selective attention which improved 8.8% within 90 min of ingesting the first dose of Cognigrape ® , an improvement which was highly significant compared to placebo ( p = 0.001).

There were highly significant associations (p < 0.001) between asking questions and subjects' residence (semi-urban, rural high development or rural low development); higher parental education; both parents being present during the consent discussions; and the use of liquid petroleum gas as the main household cooking fuel (an indicator of higher socio-economic status where the majority of households 92.6% used solid cooking fuels).

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.001), and could be confirmed by IgG-binding to a cyclic peptide representing the conformational auto-epitope within the second extracellular loop of the receptor associated with the active receptor conformation ( Table 1 ).

This quantification showed a dramatic and highly significant depletion of CD19+ B cells in AML patients (mean frequency ± standard deviation; HD: 12.4 ± 8.3; AML: 2.9 ± 3.2, p < 0.001) ( Figure 1B ).

The description of variables are as follows: Description of quantitative variables: mean and standard deviation (SD) Description of qualitative variables: numbers (No.) and percentages (%) Comparison between both groups regarding categorical data using the Chi-square test Comparison between both groups regarding scale data done using the independent t test The significance results were assessed in the form of P value: Non-significant when P value > 0.05 Significant when P value ≤ 0.05 Highly significant when P value ≤ 0.001 Results This study is a prospective single-center comparative study.

The analysis of variance (Table 3 ) showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 ) between accessions in all assessed quantitative agronomic characteristics.

We found that the paired subsamples had highly significant positive correlations in VAF (%), as shown for #M42 (R 2 = 36.7, P < 0.001; Fig 2B ), which we present because it was the most widespread de novo floral mutation in Flower #2 and present in all 20 split samples and with the combined data for all 37 de novo mutations of Flower #2 together (R 2 = 79.5, P < 0.0001; Fig 2C ).

There was a highly significant (P < 0.001) enrichment of CSF tracer in the subarachnoid space (SAS) adjacent to the straight gyrus with peak enrichment after 3–6 h (Fig. 1 ; Supplementary Table S1 ).

This difference in worker caste integration effect among body regions was highly significant (two‐sample z test; p < .001).

A Chi-squared test showed highly significant differences in AE reporting (p≤0.001) and AE grading (p≤0.001) Lower grades were more frequently reported for nonsurgical AEs.

A Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was performed to assess the statistical significance of the percent differences between the continuous DRL values estimated by the equation approach and those derived from the 10‐mm range approach, and the differences were found highly significant (P < 0.001).

1 , the correlation coefficients (r) between both methods were positive and highly significant ( P < 0.001) and ranged from 0.91 (Ca) to 0.94 (P).

Also time since amputation correlates significantly with the CHAMP in the tumor group ( p = 0,02) and was even highly significant for the trauma group ( p < 0,001) (Table 4 ).

Day 5-7 show highly significant difference (P < 0.001) as compared to day 1, thereby suggesting that the reservoir effect of topical clobetasol propionate 0.05% cream persisted till day 4.

Asterisks indicate significance of the likelihood ratio (LR) test (* p -value < 0.05, ** p -value < 0.01 and *** p -value < 0.001- highly significant).

These differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for both spectral channels.

Pairwise Nemenyi post hoc test for multiple comparisons showed no difference between the natural articulation-plus-translation condition and the only-articulation condition, p = 0.840, but highly significant differences between all other conditions, p < 0.001.

Regarding ALT as well as triglycerides, the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference between the tested groups: H (2) = 17.6, p < 0.001, H (2) = 20.2, p < 0.001, respectively.

The correlation between the early BMD values and the 24-28 month post delivery values were highly significant and reliable (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.95, p < 0.001 with 2-tailed analysis), as was the correlation between the late pregnancy BMD values and the 24-28 month post delivery value (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.97, p < 0.001 with 2 -tailed analysis).