“highly significant”

The initial DFA model, which included 14 characters measured from 137 scorpions, confirmed that morphological differences between the sexes were highly significant (Wilks’ Λ = 0.12, χ 2 = 266.87, df = 14, P < 0.001, canonical correlation = 0.936), with means for the discriminant function scores of-2.22 (range = -0.38 –-4.33) and 3.12 (range = 1.25–6.01) for females and males, respectively.

ANOVA consequently revealed a highly significant main effect of CORT level ( F 1,18 = 40, p < 0.001) ( Fig. 2 ).

visuo-haptic stimulation, F(1,7) = 1.88, p = 0.21), and the interaction between the two factors was highly significant (F(1,7) = 139.74, p < 0.001).

Using moderate harm as the outcome, the model on the QLS sample was highly significant before the addition of exceeding the low-risk gambling limits as a predictor (χ 2 = 118.59; p < .001).

In HCC, nuclear and cytoplasmic STAT1 expression, together with the STAT1-positive immune cell infiltrate, correlated highly significant with CD3-, CD4-, CD8-, and FOXP3-positive immune cell infiltrates (Spearman r = 0.335, 0.349, 0.348, and 0.394, all with p < 0.001; Figure 4 A,B and Supplementary Figure S3 ).

The effect of the target angle was marginal ( P = 0.051), the effect of the subject random factor highly significant ( P < 0.001) but without a significant effect of the network × subject interaction term ( P = 0.747).

F value of 541.656 with 3 and 56 degrees of freedom is found to be highly significant ( P <.001).

Our model revealed highly significant inverse correlations between total white matter volume and DTI‐ALPS index ( β = −0.198, p < 0.001; Figure 3 ).

Direct gradient ordination of ECM fungal communities using RDA showed that the effect of site was highly significant ( P < 0.001) in explaining the distribution of ECM species ( Figure 4A ).

Statistical evaluation showed this increase to be highly significant ( P <0.001) ( Table 1 ).

ANOVA showed highly significant ( P < 0.001 and P < 0.01) differences among genotypes both for specific locations (Islamabad and Nowshera) and across locations (combined data) ( Table 2 ).

However, regarding the age distribution of the two groups, there was a highly significant difference as most of the older age group (≥ 40) had coagulation testing (chi-square = 37.964, p < 0.001).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the effects of neck, as shown in Table 11 , trunk and knee were all highly significant, P < 0.001.

Notably, at 6 dpi, the Long-BAC group maintained a significantly elevated pathological score relative to the other two groups, with a highly significant difference compared with the rLong-BJ1903-AF group ( p < 0.001); a statistically significant difference was also observed between the rLong-BJ1903-AF and rLong-SY2103-BF groups ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 3C ).

Epidermal growth factor receptor was found to be highly significant (HR=6.9, 90% CI 4.7–10.1, P <0.001) and this can be seen in the Kaplan–Meier curves for UBC-specific survival in both NMIBC and MIBC ( Figure 4 ).

Analysis of variance for growth parameters Two-way ANOVA revealed highly significant genotype effects on all measured parameters (p < 0.001, Table 2 ), indicating substantial genetic variation among the 18 Chinese cabbage genotypes.

In contrast, caregivers with PTSS mostly reported mild symptom severity (86.1%), with five showing moderate severity (13.8%), and this difference was highly significant ( p = 0.001).

The LLM also correctly identified the highly significant difference between these molecularly defined subgroups via log-rank testing ( P <.001).

There was a highly significant dependence of RVP on age for the nonmatched DR group ( p < 0.001, slope = 0.52, 0.26–0.78).

Regression analysis of the preoperatively measured UCVA indicated a statistically highly significant connection (p<0.001) between the two scales with determination coefficient R 2 =0.6029 ( Fig. 2a ).

5D , difference highly significant, p < 0.001).

In non-survivors, a highly significant Th17/Treg ratio was also found in favor of a proinflammatory Th17-response ( P <0.001) (Table 2 ).

Highly significant differences (P<0.001) between malignant and benign cases were observed for elevated CA19-9 (>27 U/mL) and CEA levels (>5 ng/mL).

Friedman ANOVA conducted on the ATP-30 median scores showed highly significant differences between the 5 groups (p-value < 0.001).

Highly significant associations were obtained between C18:1 and the SNPs ( Table 5 ): SNP140 (r = 0.812, p < 0.001), SNP206 (r = 0.803, p < 0.001), SNP307 (r = 0.772, p < 0.001), SNP593 (r = −0.546, p = 0.016), SNP699 (r = −0.736, p < 0.001), SNP755 (r = −0.763, p < 0.001), SNP776 (r = −0.802, p < 0.001), SNP788 (r = −0.763, p < 0.001), SNP902 (r = 0.763, p < 0.001), SNP919 (r = 0.763, p < 0.001), SNP988 (r = 0.691, p = 0.001), SNP1083 (r = −0.772, p < 0.001), SNP1181 (r = 0.689, p = 0.001) and SNP1237 (r = −0.629, p = 0.004).