“highly significant”

All patients with acute infarction on the presenting CT scan had poor outcome in our study, and hence, this factor was highly significant as a predictor of poor outcome (OR could not be calculated, P < 0.001).

However, the overall response was highly significant (Z = 7.839, P < 0.001).

In “cases”, the effect sizes for statistically highly significant differences between both survey years ( p < 0.001) were small, ranging between h=0.12 (itchy scalp) and h=0.28 (skin changes).

As shown in Table 7 , all models were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for the prediction of the following language measures: Boston Naming Test , oral reading of single words, written spelling to dictation, as well as oral and written naming of the objects from the WAB.

Site-specific survival correlation Among MGC-positive cases, anatomical site showed a highly significant correlation with survival (p = 0.001).

The SRPX group demonstrated a highly significant reduction (P < 0.001) in PPD, RAL, BOP, and GI compared with the SRP group. 4 Discussion Mechanical nonsurgical periodontal therapy is considered the cornerstone of periodontitis treatment and its aim is to eliminate pathogenic bacteria in the biofilms; however, complete elimination remains elusive, especially in advanced severe cases and deep pockets ( Goodson et al., 2012 ).

There was a highly significant main effect over time (F = 219.731, p < 0.001).

The highest average desire score was observed in participants who identified as bisexual, while the lowest desire score was found in the asexual group, with the group differences highly significant ( F (4, 67,330) = 697.4, p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.04).

The lipid profile analyze of the breast cancer patients showed highly significant association with an elevated TG [OR 3.20, 95% CI (1.36–7.53), P value 0.008], TG/ HDL ratio [OR 8.82, 95% CI (2.81–27.68), P value <.001], TC/ HDL ratio [OR 9.18, 95% CI (1.12–75.15), P value .038], and a lower HDL [OR 3.32, 95% CI (1.38–7.98), P value .007] (Table 4 ).

Unexpectedly, live cells directly underneath the degrading material in Mg + RAW 264.7 LPS and AZ61 + RAW 264.7 LPS display a highly significant reduction in CC3 (p < 0.001).

The linear contrast was not significant, F (1,27) = 1.366, p = 0.253, η 2 = 0.003; the quadratic contrast was highly significant, F (1,27) = 114.315, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.073.

Variance components for the full mixed model Results from the full mixed model (Table 1 , Equation 1 ) showed a highly significant site effect on growth ( p < 0.001), evidencing significant plastic responses to the environmental conditions at each test site.

For the set of leaf hydraulic traits, the correlation between stomatal density and stomatal length was highly significant and negative (-0.58; p < 0.001).

Detection rates of hypertensive retinopathy Based on fundus examinations, the overall detection rates of hypertensive retinopathy were 3.5% (dipper), 46.8% (non-dipper), and 50.0% (reverse-dipper), with a highly significant difference among groups (χ 2 =35.066, P < 0.001).

However, the interaction of stimulation by risk-to-lose got highly significant in the overall model ( z = 6.60, p < 0.001).

The analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences (P < 0.001) for the quantitatively measured traits ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

Evaluation of antioxidant activity of trans-crocetin in vitro The scavenging ability of trans-crocetin for superoxide anion (•O 2 − ) was evaluated by the lumino-DMSO-NaOH luminescence system, and as shown in Table 5 , trans-crocetin had more vital scavenging abilities than the positive control ascorbic acid, with highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) compared with the control group.

For Bio-PC1, 43 SNPs were identified ( p < 0.01), of which 11 were highly significant ( p < 0.001), and three remained significant after adjustment for multiple testing ( q < 0.05) ( Fig 4A , S3 Table ).

The statistical analysis of the obtained data showed a highly significant effect of the electro-activation time ( p < 0.001), whereas the effect of the applied electric current was intensity-dependent.

We found highly significant differences in OS among the three groups (P < 0.001; Figure 3A ), with corresponding 5-year OS rates of 17.0% for high-risk group, 26.3% for intermediate-risk group, and 54.0% for low-risk group.

The significance level was defined as follows: p ≥ 0.05 not significant, p < 0.05 significant, p < 0.01 highly significant and p < 0.001 most highly significant.

The samples were compared using Hotelling’s t-squared distance and intensity distribution decile Z-score to detect outliers and removed from the dataset when at least one of these statistical tests was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Finally, the interaction between time and concentration was highly significant ( p < 0.001) only for the Se-GPx measure in the digestive gland and on the SOD measured in the gills ( Table 1 ).

Statistical analysis showed that M f induced a highly significant difference in the productivity (P r ) and heat-transfer (h f ) coefficients ( p < 0.001) and a significant difference in τ ( p < 0.05).

The analysis showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the two groups of ewes in the two periods for the intake of all individuals and groups of FA from the diets.