The pre-test yielded a median score of 9 (IQR: 6.7, 11), with a highly significant Z -value of −8.245 ( P < 0.001) when compared to Post-Test 1, which had a median score of 24 (IQR: 21, 25), demonstrating substantial gains in knowledge.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Similarly, complete satisfaction with the care provided by the nurses increased from 71.3% to 89.3%, which was highly significant (p<0.001).
Among all the scoring items, 10 out of 13 items showed statistically significant differences between groups ( p < 0.05 ), and 5 items exhibited highly significant differences (i, t, ptc, g, mm, p < 0.001 ).
Lastly, positive versus negative control showed a highly significant difference ( P < .001) (Table 3 ).
Statistical analyses revealed a high correlation coefficient between the rate of apoptosis of OCs and sFasL production (-0.902), which was highly significant ( P = 0.001).
This difference was highly significant (Chi-square, P < .001).
7 , 8 Amr Abou-Ei-Ezz et al 11 in their study on prevalence of mouth breathing habit and its probability as etiological factor of malocclusion have concluded that malocclusion is highly associated with habits existence and this relationship is statistically highly significant (p < 0.001).
Examination of factorial structure of the D-RECT using confirmatory factor analysis resulted in an unsatisfactory model-fit with a highly significant chi-square value of 2383,576 (p<0.001).
G3 and G4 groups were higher than the control G2 (+Ve), while G4 showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) compared to the control G2 (+Ve).
This change in CIE a* and b* affected the hue angle; after 20 d of room-temperature storage, the hue-angle value of LTS 50D was below 40, a highly significant difference compared to LTS 0D ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 E), indicating that the fruit skin color is more red.
This difference is statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) as determined by a proportionality test and independent of gender except for reproductive organs.
The logistic regression model was highly significant ( X 2 = 141.5, p < 0.001) and gave an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI [0.82–0.95], p < 0.001) ( Fig. 2 ).
The correlation between CT thickness and postoperative thickness was highly significant (Spearman rho = 0.755, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1 ).
In contrast, the multivariate OS model showed a marked reduction of heterogeneity after inclusion of covariates (τ2 decreasing from 0.933 to approximately 0), and the overall regression was highly significant (QM = 75.67; P < 0.001).
Number of squat repetitions As shown in Table 6 , A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect between groups in Set 1 (F (3,47) = 39.196, P < 0.001).
The Kruskal‐Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference in completeness scores among the various reporter types (H = 569.68; p < 0.001).
Unadjusted analyses Analysis of the unadjusted correlation between antibiotic prophylaxis and the patient characteristics’ and operating technique variables demonstrated that there were highly significant differences across all variables between the patients who had and had not received antibiotic prophylaxis (in each case p < 0.001).
Differences between groups of ∗ P <0.05 were considered statistically significant, ∗∗ P <0.01 were considered highly significant, ∗∗∗ P <0.001 were considered very highly significant. 3.
A meta-analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity in the maximum temperature-HSAD associations across prefectures, with an I 2 of 82.2% and a highly significant Cochran's Q test ( p -value < 0.001).
The effects were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The Mustadi RB and Baladi Yoga therapy provided highly significant ( P < 0.001) improvement in ability of putting small objects in a container by 14.3%, in throwing ball in all directions by 21.8%, in use of thumb and index finger by 10.99%, in retaining 2 one inches cubes by 19.04% and in folding paper and inserting it into envelope by 10.3%.
In comparison, there were highly significant and positive correlations between total P and MgCl 2 -P (r = 0.92, p < 0.001, Fig. 3a ) and HCl-P (r = 0.91, p < 0.001, Fig. 3d ) at high P levels (total P > 3.5 mg g −1 ).
As shown in Figure 1 , all HTLV-1–infected individuals (ACs, HAM/TSP, and ATLL) exhibited strong reactivity to 44 epitopes, whereas healthy controls (HCs) displayed only low-intensity binding restricted to 9 epitopes, resulting in a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) for all HTLV-1–infected groups compared with HCs.
The rolling group × PEG level interaction was also highly significant (P < 0.001) for strip length.
Chi-squared analysis revealed a highly significant ( P < 0.001) difference between total controls and treated groups.